Exclusive: Armstrong set to be allowed to keep Sydney 2000 Olympic medal despite drug ban
Wednesday, 29 August 2012
August 29 - Lance Armstrong may be allowed to keep the Olympic bronze medal he won at Sydney in 2000 because the International Olympic Committee (IOC) do not have the power to strip him of it even though he has been found guilty of using banned performance-enhancing drugs.
The cyclist faces the prospect of losing all seven of the Tour de France titles he won in consecutive years between 1999 and 2005 after the United States Anti-Doping Agency (USADA) branded him a drugs cheat and banned him for life following his decision not to defend himself against the allegations.
As part of the punishment USADA said that all of Armstrong's results from 1998 would be annulled.
But, under the Olympic Charter, the IOC maintain an eight-year statute of limitations on drug-related offences, which means that they are unable to strip Armstrong of a medal won more than a decade ago.
The American had finished third in the time trial behind Russia's Viatcheslav Ekimov and Germany's Jan Ullrich, who himself was latter banned for using performance-enhancing drugs.
If the result is allowed to stand, rider set to miss out is Spain's Abraham Olano Manzano, who finished fourth.
A spokesman for the IOC said that they could not comment on the situation until the International Cycling Union (UCI) received the report of its findings from USADA and decided what action to take.
August 2012: Armstrong decision not to fight drugs charges set to spark row between WADA and UCI
August 2012: WADA backs USADA to investigate Armstrong doping case despite McQuaid comments
June 2012: Lance Armstrong team-mates rule themselves out of London 2012
June 2012: Armstrong claims he is victim of a "conspiracy" after USADA bring doping charges against him
February 2012: Armstrong claims US Attorney made "right decision" after dropping doping probe