Nick Butler
Nick ButlerFor two sets totalling almost two-and-a-half hours, Andy Murray matched the great Serb Novak Djokovic in yesterday's Australian Open men's singles tennis final. Given how brilliantly the world number one was playing throughout, that was no mean feat.

As ever, Djokovic was sliding and scampering and scurrying around the baseline, returning balls he simply had no right to over and over again before launching a stupendous winner from some ridiculous angle. But Murray was doing exactly the same, taking the faintest whiff of every chance and refusing to be downhearted whenever an opportunity slipped away.

They were two of the very best sets of tennis I have ever seen, and, if anything, Djokovic appeared the more vulnerable of the two, clutching first his hand and then his ankle with injuries seemingly apparent only after he lost a point, and showing rare tactical naivety by charging to the net behind several timid approach shots.

With two sets on the board, I got up to have breakfast, confident I would be back in time for the business end of another spellbinding set.

Alas, by the time I returned, Djokovic had sealed the crucial break and momentum had swung once and for all. Murray, like a marathon runner who had kept up with his opponent for so long, finally faced one surge too many, and hit the wall of mental and physical exhaustion. The two lingering weaknesses in his game - his second serve and his mental fragility - were suddenly exposed and Djokovic was in no mood to take pity.

Over four sets at the Australian Open Novak Djokovic (left) was too strong for Andy Murray ©Getty ImagesOver four sets at the Australian Open Novak Djokovic (left) was too strong for Andy Murray ©Getty Images





The third and fourth sets passed in a blaze of Djokovic winners and Murray errors and the match was wrapped up little more than an hour after the end of the second set. An eighth Grand Slam title for Djokovic, and a fifth Australian Open triumph, in comparison with six losses in eight Grand Slam finals for Murray, with four of them coming in the early-year heat of Melbourne.

If he was not from the same era as Roger Federer and Rafael Nadal, Djokovic would surely already be considered among the best players of all time. His movement, agility, returning, fitness, mental strength, resilience and tactical nous is among the best in the game's history, and his lack of obvious weakness, particularly over five sets, is startling.

For Murray - lest we forget, a two time Grand Slam winner and reigning Olympic singles champion himself - it was another reminder that he remains a few steps behind the very best, at their best. While his timid second serve is a weakness which rarely proves fatal, his mental lapses are something he cannot afford. Indeed, his racquet-smashing histrionics in the third set yesterday were reminiscent of an earlier and less successful period of his career,

But, despite the disappointment, the match got me thinking about how much there is to admire in both men, just as there seems to be with Nadal and Federer and most of the other top players. As both finalists showed in their post-match comments, they are rivals on the court but respectful and, if not close friends then at least amenable, off it. There was no trash talking beforehand and no gloating afterwards, but mutual respect as they swapped compliments on the birth of Djokovic's first son and Murray's engagement to long-term girlfriend Kim Sears.

Andy Murray's girlfriend Kim Sears has also dominated the headlines during the Australian Open, opting for an ironic shirt following her supposedly foul-mouthed semi-final outburst ©Getty ImagesAndy Murray's girlfriend Kim Sears has also dominated the headlines during the Australian Open, opting for an ironic shirt following her supposedly foul-mouthed semi-final outburst ©Getty Images




Despite the lingering opposition to Murray from swathes of the British public, with his ill-advised comments shortly before last September's Scottish Independence referendum hardly helping, Murray should be respected for his professionalism, modesty and determination to win despite the brilliance of the opposition.

He needs to improve mentally, yes, but it takes a player only of Djokovic's genius to expose that weakness. He remains a role model for anyone striving to be a professional sportsman and, I feel, would probably be good company away from the court.

Similarities can be made with another of Britain's greatest sportsman, four-time Olympic gold medal and Americas Cup winning sailor Sir Ben Ainslie, about whom it has always been said that while ruthless and formidable on the water, he is calm and a gentleman off it.

They all realise that while competitive traits are vital for winning in sport, that is not the way you should act in the rest of your life. There is a section in the autobiography of Irish rugby union legend Brian O'Driscoll, The Test, comparing the answers he could truthfully have given to questions in a press conference, and the blander and less confrontational ones he actually gave, to therefore a conjure a public image at odds to his actual personality.

Of course, as O'Driscoll suggests, we, the public, do not really know what Murray or Djokovic and Sir Ben are really like in private, and, in the modern sporting world of PR speak and media training, their apparent humbleness and mutual appreciation may be all a façade.

Yet there are some sportsman who are incapable of even attempting this difference.

Lance Armstrong is a sportsman who conducted himself very differently to Novak Djokovic and Andy Murray during his career ©AFP/Getty ImagesLance Armstrong is a sportsman who conducted himself very differently to Novak Djokovic and Andy Murray during his career ©AFP/Getty Images



Disgraced cyclist Lance Armstrong is one example, after being in the news again following an interview with the BBC in which he showed a distinct lack of remorse for his doping misdeeds.

Last week, for the first time I watched a clip of Armstrong speaking at a press conference shortly before his comeback to cycling at the 2009 Tour of California. When asked a question about doping by Irish journalist Paul Kimmage, the American, subsequently stripped of all seven of his Tour de France titles after oh-so-belatedly admitting his drug use, could only respond by launching an attack of his own.

Telling Kimmage he would probably never forgive him for his prior labelling of Armstrong as the "cancer of cycling", adding that he doubts many other people in the room would forgive him either.

It is great footage, shining the journalist in a very good retrospective light, but it highlights, as Armstrong has now admitted the BBC, that he only knows one way to act. Be it in a press conference, on an Alpine ascent or elsewhere in public, he could never stop "fighting", lashing out to defend a name that since been tarnished so severely.

There are some who say tennis is the next sport in which a doping crisis could happen, and if one of the top players was implicated, many of us would probably lose any remaining faith in sport. But, with no evidence, that is not something we should dwell upon and, instead, we should be thankful of the fact that men like Djokovic and Murray dominate the sport rather than personalities like Lance Armstrong.

And if Murray can sort out his mental fallibility, expect more rivalries between the two in the months and years ahead, maybe on the grass of Wimbledon this summer.

Nick Butler is a Senior Reporter for insidethegames. To follow him on Twitter click here.