Nick Butler
Nick Butler insidethegames tieThere have been two notable stories over the last week encompassing the same broad theme of a second chance to shine on the biggest sporting stage, although the circumstances and individuals involved bear very little in common.

The first case involves one of the greatest athletes of all time after the 18-time Olympic swimming champion Michael Phelps abandoned his short-lived retirement in a bid to return to the top of the podium at Rio 2016.

And the second involves cricket coach Peter Moores, who has been given the responsibility of leading England's recovery out of the abyss of a 5-0 Ashes defeat barely five years after being sacked from an ill-fated stint in the same role.

The comeback is one of those fairytale storylines in sport, and can be a brilliant, latterly step in the successful career of a player, coach or administrator. But for every Hollywood-style return to greatness, there are plenty of flops, falls and failures.

The trick is, first of all, knowing the right time to call it a day and then knowing whether it is worth coming back, with talent, age, desire, reputation, and what-you-have-to-prove among the factors which must be considered.

Phelps' example is a classic one of an athlete realising the retired life is not for them. After spending the bulk of their lives embarking on a tortuous and sacrificial training routine to reach the top, they are desperate for a break, but once they have had it they find a gaping void which can only be filled by a return to action. Sometimes they come back for financial reasons but usually it is more due to a need for adrenalin, motivation or simply for something to do.

Since bursting on to the scene with a 200 metres butterfly world title in 2001 aged 15, Phelps won those staggering 18 Olympic gold medals across Athens 2004, Beijing 2008 and London 2012, as well as 27 world titles, before a long-anticipated retirement two years ago.

But over the last few months the rumour-mill has been in overdrive that he was back in training before the worst kept secret in sport was confirmed last week, with a comeback date set for a meet in Mesa, Arizona, starting on Thursday (April 24).

Michael Phelps will resume a career which has already included 18 Olympic gold medals later this week ©Getty ImagesMichael Phelps will resume a career which has already included 18 Olympic gold medals later this week ©Getty Images



His prospects have been played down by his team, with long-term coach Bob Bowman describing how "he's just going to test the waters a little bit and see how it goes", before adding that he  "wouldn't say it's a full-fledged comeback".

But I would not get taken in by this rhetoric. Phelps' career has been based around the Olympics more than any other and the ideal plan must be Rio 2016 and an increase on his already record-breaking medal haul.

By this point, at 31 he will be fairly ancient for a top level swimmer and comparisons are already being made with the disastrous comeback of former rival Ian Thorpe in 2011. But, while Thorpe was out of action for years before coming back, Phelps has only been out the water for 18 months or so and the swimming world has not moved on too far in his absence. So unlike Thorpe, if he gets back to the same shape he was in before his retirement, he will be fast enough to win medals again.

That is a big if, particular with the depth greater than ever, but despite the long odds my view is write Michael Phelps off at your peril.

Whatever happens, Phelps will slot into one of three groups of sporting comebacks.

In the worst case scenario he will join figures like Thorpe, Bjorn Borg or Lance Armstrong whose comebacks have ended in failure and, in the case of Armstrong, the destruction of their earlier reputation. He could join those in the middle, like Ricky Hatton or Michael Schumacher, who fail to reach the giddy heights of before but still proved something, that they were justified in having a go at returning.

Or, just perhaps, he could return to the top for a final time with all the brilliance of a Paul Scholes, a Michael Jordan, a Sir Steve Redgrave or a Floyd Mayweather.

Sir Steve Redgrave produced one of the great Olympic comebacks to win a fifth gold medal in Sydney ©Getty ImagesSir Steve Redgrave produced one of the great Olympic comebacks to win a fifth gold medal in Sydney ©Getty Images



Phelps' legacy will be affected to some extent however he fares but perhaps the most important point to prove will be to himself, for he will know the answer to that otherwise eternally elusive question of "What if?"

The case of Peter Moores is less of a personal one and more about a cricketing fraternity placing their trust in a man who has failed before in the hope that he will come back a better man second time around.

A former player turned county coach, Moores was appointed England boss in 2007 and, after a mediocre record, lost his job at the beginning of 2009 after publically falling out with captain Kevin Pietersen, who was also sacked. With Pietersen returning to the team in a non-captaining role soon after, the team soared to new heights before falling so dramatically with their 5-0 Ashes reverse to Australia. Moores on the other hand returned to the domestic game to lead Lancashire to the 2011 County Championship.

But with Pietersen sacked again and seemingly out of the picture once and for all, Moores has become the appointed man to lead England back out of the doldrums.

Peter Moores was neither the first nor last to fall afoul of Kevin Pietersen during his first stint as England coach ©Getty ImagesPeter Moores (right) was neither the first nor last to fall afoul of Kevin Pietersen during his first stint as England coach ©Getty Images



The first impression of many is that this is a bad decision, and more evidence of the England and Wales Cricket Board failing to make the brave, radical and necessary changes. And it does not compare well with Australia who, a similar state of dilapidation this time last year, appointed a radical throw-back in Darren Lehmann and promptly reaped the dividends.

Yet gasping for air in the midst of the dissenting voices are various experts within the game who are more in favour. Moores is an attacking coach, they claim, who was not able to change as he wished before when confronted with a raft of established yet stubborn senior players. But now, in a developing team in which no one is sure of their place, he will be the right man to take England forward.

Time will tell but the case marks an unusual example of someone given a second bite at the cherry in as cut-throat a world as professional sport.

The question of whether to persevere, or be allowed to persevere, in a sporting post has been an increasingly important one in recent times. It has been seen a lot in an administrative sense, from the decision of Jacques Rogge to stay on for four more years as International Olympic Committee (IOC) President in 2009 to the choices coming up for the likes of Sepp Blatter and Princess Haya bint Al Hussein in the sports of football and equestrian respectively.

Another good example concerns the recently appointed IOC Athletes' Commission member Ole Einar Bjørndalen. After a biathlon career not quite as medal strewn at that of Michael Phelps, but not far behind, Ole Einar planned to retire after Sochi but changed his mind and now hopes to stay on until the 2016 World Championships in his native Norway because he still feels he can be competitive at the highest level.

On the other hand we had Irish rugby legend Brian O'Driscoll who was still at his brilliant best in inspiring his country to Six Nations success last month, but realised that his beleaguered body would not last much longer so it would be best to quit on a glorious high.

The ultimate example of when best to bow out was exemplified last year by Manchester United manager Sir Alex Ferguson. After the ignominy of losing on the final day of the season to arch-rivals Manchester City, "Fergie" hit back by winning the Premier League title in 2013 before retiring. The remarkable demise of the team this season under successor David Moyes can be taken as evidence that it was the right time to go.

Given the fortunes experienced by his successor, Sir Alex Ferguson clearly chose the right time to leave Manchester United ©Manchester United/Getty ImagesGiven the fortunes experienced by his successor, Sir Alex Ferguson clearly chose the right time to leave Manchester United ©Manchester United/Getty Images



To an extent, as in other walks of life, all of these decisions are a lottery. You never know what is going to happen and in a few years time we could be talking about the return of either Michael Phelps or Peter Moores as one of the greatest decisions ever made, or a bad mistake which was doomed always to fail.

But it is one of those themes which makes sport all the more exciting and unpredictable, and seeing how both of these would-be comeback kings get on will add another reason to watch sport in the build-up to Rio 2016 and the following summer's Ashes series.

Nick Butler is a reporter for insidethegames. To follow him on Twitter click here.