Nick Butler: Was last week a watershed moment in the IOC’s response to Russian doping?

Nick Butler: Was last week a watershed moment in the IOC’s response to Russian doping?

Richard McLaren’s 144-page report on Russian doping published last week was exactly what some sporting bodies have spent the past five months publicly calling for but privately hoping would never emerge: a smorgasbord of evidence implicating thousands of athletes which was damning yet also meticulous. In short, irrefutable proof that the world’s largest country was cheating not only to the level alleged, but to an even greater extent.






Samples given by Russian athletes from London 2012 to be analysed as IOC claims 63 blood tests from Sochi 2014 were all negative

Samples given by Russian athletes from London 2012 to be analysed as IOC claims 63 blood tests from Sochi 2014 were all negative

All samples given by Russian athletes at London 2012 will be examined after the International Olympic Committee (IOC) extended the mandate of one of the Commissions looking into allegations of manipulation at Sochi 2014 in the wake of the damning findings revealed in the second part of the McLaren Report today.





David Owen: Targeting the worst drug cheats is all fine and dandy, but with retrospective analysis, all samples should eventually be re-tested

David Owen: Targeting the worst drug cheats is all fine and dandy, but with retrospective analysis, all samples should eventually be re-tested

Let’s begin by giving the International Olympic Committee (IOC) a little credit.

By storing Olympic athletes’ anti-doping samples for possible reanalysis for a number of years, in the knowledge that analytical methods will probably improve over time, the IOC has put in place a valuable tool that could, if utilised to fullest extent, afford periodic snapshots of the true level of doping in elite sport, albeit some years after the event.