David Owen: Is FIFA spending too much?

Duncan Mackay
David OwenAnd so, with a final flourish, Sepp Blatter got out his cheque-book and wrote out a cheque for $200 million (£118 million/€147 million). No, the FIFA President's closing gesture at last week's FIFA Congress in São Paulo was not quite that dramatic. But his promise of $750,000 (£441,000/€552,000) to all 209 national associations and $7 million (£4 million/€5 million) to each of the six Confederations has the same effect.

To which my question is this: has this $198.75 million (£116.85 million/€146.30 million) of apparently extra expenditure already been written in to FIFA's budgets? If the answer is "No", then it ratchets up my concerns about the rate at which the governing body's spending is increasing. You could be forgiven for thinking this was the least of the worries of this much-criticised body, which is usually portrayed as being awash with cash. But I have to say, that is not the way I see it.

To put matters into perspective, it is not that Blatter and his lieutenants are in danger of going out of business. FIFA's reserves, when last reported, stood at an enviable $1.4 billion (£823 million/€1 million). But when an organisation is as dependent as FIFA on one event that comes around every four years, it is prudent to have reserves of this magnitude. Indeed, it would be a matter of some concern if they were to start being eaten into.

Yet this, so far as I can see after a morning spent poring over FIFA accounts, may be what is about to happen - particularly if the money men in Zurich do now have to rustle up an extra unbudgeted $200 million (£118 million/€147 million) to fund the President's largesse.

Sepp Blatter promised each of FIFA's 209 members a $750,000 bonus at the world governing body's Congress in São Paulo ©AFP/Getty ImagesSepp Blatter promised each of FIFA's 209 members a $750,000 bonus at the world governing body's Congress in São Paulo ©AFP/Getty Images

This is what I have gleaned from various FIFA accounts:

The original 2011-14 blueprint - set out in the 2009 financial report - budgeted for $3.8 billion (£2.2 billion/€2.8 billion) of revenues and $3.6 billion (£2.1 billion/€2.7 billion) of investment (or spending). This would make for a $200 million (£118 million/€147 million) surplus and a $140 million (£82 million/€103 million) increase in FIFA's equity, once depreciation was taken into account.

What has actually happened - so far - is that revenues have already hit $3.62 billion (£2.13 billion/€2.66 billion) in the first three years of the World Cup cycle. However, expenses have raced away to $3.43 billion (£2.02 billion/€2.52 billion), leaving a positive result for the three years of $197 million (£116 million/€145 million).

This is less than half the $429 million (£252 million/€316 million) generated in the first three years of the last cycle, but leaves FIFA on target to hit its budgeted surplus for the four years, depending on what happens this year.

This brings me to something I had not previously noticed (largely because it is set out in the 2012 financial report), which is the detailed budget for 2014. This appears to put budgeted revenue for the year at $1.08 billion (£635 million/€745 million) and budgeted investments at $1.41 billion (£611 million/€1.04 billion).

The document coyly fails to spell out the budgeted result that this would give rise to, but I make it a deficit of $332 million (£195 million/€244 million). If duly realised, this would be enough to push FIFA into deficit for the whole cycle. And if another $200 million (£118 million/€147 million) does need to be found to fund Blatter's new promise, that deficit could start to look rather substantial. (I did note, however, that the FIFA President left open the possibility that some of the money might not be paid until early 2015, suggesting the cost might be spread over two years - and two World Cup cycles).

If you think about additional expenditure FIFA has become committed to in recent times - the club protection programme, increased payments to World Cup participants, Michael Garcia's investigation into allegations of wrongdoing in the 2018 and 2022 World Cup bid process, higher -than-budgeted costs for the 2014 World Cup - I don't actually find this all that surprising. But if there is a deficit for 2014, it may be the start of a trend.

Michael Garcia is leading an investigation of allegations of corruption about the bidding process for the 2018 and 2022 World Cups which will drain FIFA's resources ©AFP/Getty ImagesMichael Garcia is leading an investigation of allegations of corruption about the bidding process for the 2018 and 2022 World Cups which will drain FIFA's resources
©AFP/Getty Images


As I reported in March, FIFA's blueprint for the next World Cup cycle between 2015 and 2018 (published in its 2013 financial report), calls for a balanced budget over the cycle, once depreciation and taxes are taken into account. FIFA has even warned that individual annual results "may even be negative". Projections accompanying the text suggested, indeed, that it might suffer deficits of as much as $30 million (£18 million/€22 million), after depreciation and taxes, in 2015 and $20 million (£12 million/€15 million) in 2016. These would be balanced by a $50 million (£29 million/€37 million) surplus in World Cup year, 2018.

That level of financial performance would be nothing to really worry about, given the reserves FIFA has accumulated. But what if that 2015-2018 budget is as wide of the mark as the 2011-2014 budget may turn out to be? Those reserves might start disappearing with disconcerting speed, forcing the Swiss-based emperors of world football to clamp down hard on costs, including the fabled development programmes that have made such a contribution to Blatter's enduring popularity among football's national bosses.

Those 2015-2018 numbers, moreover, include the assumption that revenues will keep growing at a fair old lick to $5 billion (£3 billion/€4 billion) over the cycle.

FIFA's finances are reliant on the World Cup not losing its attraction ©Getty ImagesFIFA's finances are reliant on the World Cup not losing its attraction ©Getty Images

Such is the pull of the World Cup that there is no sign of it happening yet, but what if all the criticism and bad news did finally start to affect sponsors' appetite for doing business with FIFA? Then football's rulers would have to rein in costs even more.

Don't get me wrong: FIFA remains an awfully long way from the poor house; most sports bodies would absolutely love to have its finances and earning power. But these figures suggest that Blatter's organisation could be about to experience three annual deficits in a row - unless 2014 revenues are significantly higher than budgeted. Indeed, it would not take a great deal to make that four, or even five consecutive annual deficits.

Yes, FIFA has more immediate problems, but the next couple of financial reports promise to make unusually interesting reading.

David Owen worked for 20 years for the Financial Times in the United States, Canada, France and the UK. He ended his FT career as sports editor after the 2006 World Cup and is now freelancing, including covering the 2008 Beijing Olympics, the 2010 World Cup and London 2012. Owen's Twitter feed can be accessed here.

Mike Rowbottom: This is the way the sporting world ends, not with a bang but a whimper

Mike Rowbottom
Mike Rowbottom ©insidethegamesIn the blizzard of tweets marking the end of Spain's reign in world football, British 400 metres runner Conrad Williams likened the early exit of the defending champions to Usain Bolt failing to progress from the heats.

Well that could never happen. Could it?

Of course it could. It might not happen, if Bolt manages to resist the temptation to put his feet up and enjoy life at least until after the Rio 2016 Games. But it could.

Unlike individuals, national teams can never retire. Not for them the smartly timed announcement in the ring, or after the finish line on the road or in the track. They are committed to continuing, obliged to make running repairs as their key components falter or fail.

Vicente del Bosque, Spain's coach - or, reportedly, outgoing coach - has led his nation to a World Cup win in 2010 and the retention of the European Championship title in 2012.

But now he is traduced for excessive loyalty, to the likes of his goalkeeper Iker Casillas, or insufficient loyalty, after dropping one of the side's key elements, midfielder Xavi, following the traumatic 5-1 defeat by the Netherlands in their first group game.

Spain's players leave the pitch in Brazil after the 2-0 defeat by Chile which sent them out of the World Cup finals ©Getty ImagesSpain's players leave the pitch in Brazil after the 2-0 defeat by Chile which sent them out of the World Cup finals ©Getty Images








Spain have been a delight; now they are like a vivid flower which has gone over. Their short-passing, "tiki-taka" style makes them resemble a clock, going tick tock. They have been a precision mechanism. And when one or more part becomes imprecise, it throws the whole. The Spanish clock is out of time.

Spain are not the only World Cup holders to go out in the group stages. In 2010, Italy did so. In 2002, France suffered that fate. Brazil, whose star man Pele was brutalised by first Bulgaria and then Portugal, made an early exit in 1966 and Italy did so in 1950, albeit after a 12-year gap following their 1938 victory.

Pele makes a sad exit from the 1966 World Cup finals after being repeatedly fouled by Portugal ©Hulton Archive/Getty ImagesPele makes a sad exit from the 1966 World Cup finals after being repeatedly fouled by Portugal ©Hulton Archive/Getty Images

They are, however, the first defending World Cup champions to lose both their opening matches at the next version of the tournament.

Spain's so-called golden generation has finally tarnished, as all golden generations must.  But at least it has shone proudly for almost a decade, unlike some other teams so named. Are we talking about England in 2002, 2006?  Yes we are.

England football supporters will also recall the World Cup winners of 1966, and their subsequent, inevitable, slide from that pinnacle. Although they were defeated in the quarter-finals by West Germany at the Mexico World Cup four years later, the quality of that side was as high, if not higher, than the one which had ensured home success at Wembley.

But by the time they lost to Poland in their campaign to qualify for the 1974 World Cup finals, with the great Bobby Moore's feet finally turning to clay in what was to be his 107th and penultimate game for his country, you could tell the jig was up. England's subsequent failure to earn the win they needed at Wembley in their return match against Poland, which ended 1-1, confirmed that sense of foreboding.

England goalkeeper Peter Shilton cannot watch as Allan Clarke scores a penalty at Wembley which levelled the scores with Poland in their crucial qualifying match for the 1974 World Cup finals but which was still not good enough to allow them to qualify  ©Hulton Archives/Getty ImagesEngland goalkeeper Peter Shilton cannot watch as Allan Clarke scores a penalty at Wembley which levelled the scores with Poland in their crucial qualifying match for the 1974 World Cup finals but which was still not good enough to allow them to qualify
©Hulton Archives/Getty Images


Rarely do such individuals as Moore emerge. And to witness them sinking is always a rather mournful experience.

At the age of 37, Canada's famed ice hockey player Wayne Gretzky used the 1998 Nagano Olympics - which had signalled willingness to accommodate the professionals from the National Hockey League - to make his international farewell as a player after a career reputed to have earned him more than $100 million (£59 million/€73 million).

The man who finished his career as the NHL's all-time record points scorer showed only glimpses of a sublime gift that had already been diminished by a serious back injury five years earlier.

Wayne Gretsky, number 99, makes his final international appearance at the 1998 Nagano Winter Olympics  ©Bongarts/Getty ImagesWayne Gretsky, number 99, makes his final international appearance at the 1998 Nagano Winter Olympics ©Bongarts/Getty Images

But at 5ft 11in, and dwarfed by his 6ft 4in colleague Eric Lindros, Gretzky - in his trademark 99 shirt - still demonstrated a game which, like his face, was all angles. The progress of the years was evident in one obvious respect in Japan, however. While his younger colleagues vaulted to and fro over the barrier between bench and ice, Gretzky used the gate provided.

He departed with dignity after Canada had lost their semi-final to the eventual winners, the Czech Republic, commenting: "When you don't win, you have to accept the lumps and take your bruises. When you win, you accept the flowers and roses."

That quote could have stood as comment for the final dying falls of two of Britain's superlative athletes, Steve Cram and Sebastian Coe.

By the time Cram got to the 1990 European Championships in Split, the memory of his annus mirabilis of 1985 - when he set world records for the mile, 1500m and 2,000m in the space of 19 days - and his sublime performances at the following year's Commonwealth Games in Edinburgh - had been overlaid with the frustration and pain of injuries. In Split, he gave it a right go, but eventually faded to fifth in the 1500m final. I was there in the stadium - and it just didn't seem right.

Earlier in that year, Coe, double Olympic 1500m champion and multiple world record holder, ran what was to be his final international race at the Auckland Commonwealth Games in the final of the 800m, for which he held a world record of 1min 41.73sec which would not be beaten for another seven years.

Seb Coe chats to Scotland's Tom McKean before the 800m final at the 1990 Commonwealth Games. He finished sixth ©Getty ImagesSeb Coe (left) chats to Scotland's Tom McKean before the 800m final at the 1990 Commonwealth Games. He finished sixth ©Getty Images




Coe was suffering from a chest infection at those Games. As he tracked Kenya's Nixon Kiprotich into the final bend, BBC's commentator David Coleman commented: "And Coe is waiting to strike." But the finish the world had seen so often from this great athlete was not there, and as the field reached the halfway point in the final straight, Coleman was dismissive: "And Coe is beaten". The beleaguered Englishman finished sixth in a race where his team mate Matthew Yates came through for a surprise bronze behind Kiprotich and the Kenyan winner, Sammy Tirop.

I was there in the Mount Smart Stadium that day. I felt glad for Yates. But I felt sad for Coe.

Spain's conclusive 2-0 defeat by Chile prompted the following tweet from John Sinnott, senior sports producer for CNN's International Digital team:

"Nobody wanted it to end this way - the humbling of a side which has brought so much joy to world"

But that's the way it always ends, John.

Mike Rowbottom, one of Britain's most talented sportswriters, covered the London 2012 Olympics and Paralympics as chief feature writer for insidethegames, having covered the previous five summer Games, and four winter Games, for The Independent. He has worked for the Daily Mail, The Times, The Observer, The Sunday Correspondent and The Guardian. His latest book Foul Play – the Dark Arts of Cheating in Sport (Bloomsbury £12.99) is available at the insidethegames.biz shop. To follow him on Twitter click here.

Philip Barker: Queen's Baton Relay return home to Scotland sparks speculation over who will be final bearer

Duncan Mackay
Philip BarkerTwenty eight summers ago, an open horse drawn carriage carried The Queen away from Edinburgh's Meadowbank Stadium after the XIII Commonwealth Games as the band played  the traditional air "Auld Lang Syne".

Now the Games are about to return to Scotland.

Some eight months after the Queen placed her "address" in the Rennie Mackintosh inspired baton at Buckingham Palace it has at last reached Scotland to signal that Glasgow 2014 is nearly here.

The Queen's baton relay - or QBR in shorthand - has become the biggest event of its kind in world sport. Whereas the journey of the Olympic Torch has been scaled down to a domestic affair which passes through Greece and that year's host nation, the QBR rejoices in visiting every single Commonwealth territory.

This year is the third time that a Scottish city has hosted the Commonwealth Games but the sixth occasion that Glasgow has been visited by the Baton .In fact, even this 2014 incarnation will be returning to Scottish soil. Back in October, as organisers launched the appeal to find runners to carry it through the Highlands, it was taken to  Stirling University. Swimmer Ross Murdoch and triathlete Marc Austin seized their chance to hold it .

The Queen's Baton Relay for Glasgow 2014 has already made a brief stopover in Scotland when it visited Stirling University ©Glasgow 2014The Queen's Baton Relay for Glasgow 2014 has already made a brief stopover in Scotland when it visited Stirling University ©Glasgow 2014

In 1970. Edinburgh was the stage for  what were then known as  the British Commonwealth Games. Organisers had decided that "the Baton containing the message should be carried around as large a part of Scotland as practicable during the week preceding the Games. Thus many distant places from Edinburgh would feel they were playing some part in Scotland's Games."

A competition was held by the Royal College of Art. Hector Miller was the winner and executed his design in silver gilt. Two Batons were made and were the gift of the Worshipful company of Goldsmiths.

The Relay that year had begun in Yellowknife in Canada's Northwest Territory. It is the only time to date that the  it has ever started its journey outside England. It landed at Prestwick Airport where Games organising Chairman Sir Herbert Brechin was waiting to greet it. The first Scottish runner was 21-year-old John Ferguson who began the 700 mile journey around Scotland with an escort of fellow members of Ayr Seaforth Harriers in their distinctive club running vests. They were one of 18 organisations who participated. Unlike earlier Relays it took place exclusively in the hours of daylight.

The runners headed to the Borders and then to Glasgow where 14-year-old Doreen Arthur of City of Glasgow Ladies AC and four escort runners arrived to present it to the Lord Provost Donald Liddle. In turn, he handed it to representatives of the Glasgow Union of Youth Clubs to continue the journey.

It headed North towards Aberdeen and, although the organisers had hoped it would cause a stir, The Scotsman noted that in Aberdeen it had "passed unheralded and almost unnoticed" when it was received by from 16-year-old Yvonne Valentine by Lord Provost James Lamond.

Commonwealth Games marathon champion Jim Alder was the final person to carry the Queen's Baton Relay at the Opening Ceremony of Edinburgh 1970 ©Hulton Archive/Getty ImagesCommonwealth Games marathon champion Jim Alder was the final person to carry the Queen's Baton Relay at the Opening Ceremony of Edinburgh 1970
©Hulton Archive/Getty Images


It was a different story when the Baton finally reached Edinburgh and at the Meadowbank Stadium.

Marathon runner Jim Alder had been selected as the final bearer. He had won gold at the 1966 Games in Kingston, despite a mistake by officials who misdirected him outside the stadium .He made light of the extra distance  to win the race and had no problems with a much shorter run on a new synthetic track to deliver the baton in 1970. Prince Philip read the message from The Queen, who later attended the Games in person for the first time.

When the Games returned to Edinburgh 16 years later, there was a certain symmetry when the Baton crossed the border into Scotland. This time Alder, who had turned 46 the previous week, walked at a much more sedate pace with the baton through an avenue of flags representing the Commonwealth countries, though sadly, many  stayed away from the Games themselves in a boycott over rugby contacts with South Africa.

The Relay through Scotland over the next nine days was sponsored was organised by Sir James Orr in conjunction with 52 Lowland Brigade, based at Edinburgh Castle. Organisers insisted "the accent was on youth" and many runners and cyclists took part. The Baton also visited the rowing venue at Strathclyde.

It was sponsored for the first time. The Royal Mail's Datapost service had transported the baton around the British Isles.

Sprinter Allan Wells was chosen to bring the baton into the stadium. A Commonwealth gold medallist at Edmonton 1978 and Brisbane 1982, he had been a volunteer helper at the Meadowbank Stadium in 1970. Wells was flanked by six champions from those Games, athletes Lachie Stewart, Rosemary Stirling, Rosemary Payne, Ian Stewart, boxer Tom Imrie and fencer Sandy Leckie.

Again it fell to Prince Philip to read the message,  the final time he would do so as President of the Commonwealth Games Federation (CGF).

In the new Millennium, the Baton Relay has returned to the Highlands on three occasions.

David Beckham carried the Queen's Baton Relay into the City of Manchester Stadium at the 2002 Commonwealth Games ©AFP/Getty ImagesDavid Beckham carried the Queen's Baton Relay into the City of Manchester Stadium at the 2002 Commonwealth Games ©AFP/Getty Images

In 2002,Manchester in the North West of England were to stage the  Games They decided a wide ranging event would help in "securing the involvement of people across Britain, engaging them in the spirit of the Manchester 2002 Commonwealth Games".

All the nations and regions were involved and Scotland was allocated five days in the Relay with Stranraer as the first port of call.

Earlier in the year Great Britain had won Olympic gold in curling at Salt Lake City. Every member of the team was Scottish. Janice Rankin, Fiona Macdonald and alternate Margaret Morton invited to take part in the Relay .Hammy McMillan, skip of the men's team and a former world champion, also carried the Baton.

When the Relay reached Glasgow, hammer thrower Chris Black who had won bronze for Scotland at the  1982 Brisbane Games, Edinburgh 1970 high jump medallist Moira Maguire and Paralympian swimmer Maggie McEnely showed the Baton to crowds watching the Scottish trials at Scotstoun Stadium.

Athlete Kirsty Law carried it from Urquart Castle to Loch Ness, where Adrian Shine of the Deepscan Loch Ness project lowered it 220 metres into the dark and mysterious waters.

This was an echo of the Sydney Olympics in 2000. Then, the Torch had been taken underwater at the Great Barrier Reef. Sadly, although the 2002 baton was capable of recording heartbeats, it found no evidence of a monster lurking in the depths.

Sir Peter Heatly, long-serving chairman of the CGF, and himself a three-time diving gold medallist, took the baton in Aberdeen.

Willie Shanks, an 87-year-old stalwart of the local society to promote the work of the great Scottish poet Robbie Burns, carried the baton from the Bannockburn Memorial.

The journey to the 2006 Melbourne Games began fully a year before their Games. For the first time it visited every territory in the Commonwealth. When it stopped in Glasgow,it visited some of the arenas which will see service next month. Lee McConnell, a silver medallist over 400 metres in 2002, took it around the perimeter at Hampden Park. It also made a stop at the Tollcross swimming venue .

The city had already been chosen as the venue for 2014 by the time that the Relay to Delhi began in November 2009. Yvonne Murray, 10,000m gold medallist at the 1994 Games in Victoria, took the baton at Glasgow's Kelvin Grove Museum during another brief visit to the city.

Five-time Olympic cycling gold medallist Sir Chris Hoy carried the Queen's Baton Relay for Glasgow 2014 when it was launched in London last October ©Getty ImagesFive-time Olympic cycling gold medallist Sir Chris Hoy carried the Queen's Baton Relay for Glasgow 2014 when it was launched in London last October ©Getty Images

Over the next month, the speculation over the identity of the final bearer will reach fever pitch. The regulations used to specify "the runner carrying the baton into the stadium should be a medallist from the host country of a previous Games".

That rule has been relaxed since 1990 as organisers looked for more unorthodox choices. Eventer Mark Todd arrived on his famous horse Charisma at the Auckland opening. Four years later in Victoria, biathlete Myriam Bedard was another Olympic, rather than Commonwealth champion, when she arrived on dry land skis with the 1994 baton. At Manchester in 2002 David Beckham delighted the crowds in Manchester when he appeared in the Stadium.

Glasgow's organisers might well pick up the football theme. The Games open at Celtic Park, home of the fabled "Lisbon Lions" who lifted the European Cup in 1967. Billy McNeill was their captain that golden afternoon and as a club ambassador could well figure, but this being Glasgow, the other Old Firm Club, Rangers would also have to be recognised. John Greig skippered them to the European Cup winners' Cup in 1972. Could there also be a place for Kenny Dalglish, still the only Scottish footballer to win 100 caps, or rugby union's Sir Ian McGeechan, an outstanding British Lions player and coach?.

Since 2002, the trend has been to have more than one runner carry the baton in the stadium  so reigning Wimbledon champion Andy Murray must also be in with a great chance. Scotland's greatest Olympian. Sir Chris Hoy seems certain to play his part. Resplendent in kilt, he walked up the Mall to show the Baton to the world at the very start of this Relay. For him to end it too would be the ultimate in symmetry.

Philip Barker has worked as a television journalist for 25 years. He began his career with Trans World Sport, then as a reporter for Skysports News and the ITV breakfast programme. A regular Olympic pundit on BBC Radio, Sky News and Talksport, he is associate editor of the Journal of Olympic History, has lectured at the National Olympic Academy and contributed extensively to Team GB publications. His latest book, Lord's First: 200 Years of Making History at Lord's Cricket Ground, has recently been published. To follow him on Twitter click here.

Alan Hubbard: Sebastian Coe would have made ideal candidate to replace slippery Sepp

Duncan Mackay
Alan HubbardSebastian Coe had a flirtation with FIFA eight years ago when he was drafted in to chair their Ethics Commission. Some will wish that brief encounter had blossomed into a full-blown romance and that he would now be in a position to depose Sepp Blatter as the deeply troubled world football body's overlord.

FIFA desperately needs a Coe-like figure to purify the turbulent murky waters now engulfing the once Beautiful Game.

Coe himself is ideally equipped for the task: respected worldwide as a sporting icon, consummate politician and diplomat, supreme organiser, genuine football lover and, above all, incorruptible.

Unfortunately, despite being informally "tapped up" by several prominent figures in the international game, he has decided he has other sporting fish to fry, principally his  desire to head the International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF) which, ultimately, might lead to a future Presidency of the International Olympic Committee (IOC).

Sebastian Coe might have been a contender to replace Sepp Blatter as FIFA President if things had worked out differently ©Getty ImagesSebastian Coe might have been a contender to replace Sepp Blatter as FIFA President if things had worked out differently ©Getty Images

And now there is another complication for the sports world's most head-hunted statesman.

Having resisted pressure from the Tory high command to run for London Mayor in 2016 when the present incumbent Boris-bikes it to Westminster, Lord Coe finds himself strongly touted as the next chair of the BBC Trust.

It is reported that the Rt Hon Lord Coe, CH, KBE,  double Olympic 1,500 metres champion, former czar of London's 2012 Organising Committee and current chair of the British Olympic Association, has been approached by the Government about the role.

This he denies, but insiders say he is in pole position and has only to give the nod.

All very flattering, says Coe, who shrugs it off by saying: "Every job that comes up, whether it is Mayor of London, FIFA, the IOC and now the BBC, I seem to be slated for it."

Indeed he does. While refuting suggestions that he has been officially  approached Coe does admit that he has "some thinking to do".

But he admitted in a BBC radio interview: "It is a very meaty job and I'm passionate about public service broadcasting. I was brought up to it. I've been the subject of it in my athletics career, the BBC were our partners during the bid and then the delivery of the Games "

So shall we take that as a yes then? Actually, no, I don't think so. For becoming the Beeb boss inevitably would mean that Coe must be lost to sport, which he surely would hate.

It is technically a three-days-a-week job, but Coe is already committed to two days a week with the BOA and he has considerable business  commitments, which he would have to forgo, as chair of the sports marketing arm of global conglomerate Chime Communications.

And it would almost certainly mean him having to abandon any challenge for the IAAF Presidency next year.

Sebastian Coe gave up his role with FIFA when he became involved with England's ill-fated bid to host the 2018 World Cup ©Getty ImagesSebastian Coe gave up his role with FIFA when he became involved with England's ill-fated bid to host the 2018 World Cup ©Getty Images

All of which must make the apparently immovable Herr Blatter sigh with relief. For in different circumstances the globally popular Coe  would be his worst nightmare as a credible contender for the FIFA Presidency.

Ironically it was Blatter who appointed him as the first chairman of FIFA's independent watchdog in 2006, declaring: "We have found an outstanding personality in the world of sport, a great personality in the Olympic Movement."

But Coe later had to step down from this post when he joined England's failed bid to stage the 2018 World Cup, won by Russia.

So it  looks as if we are stuck with Blatter for a few more years yet, a situation which ought to cause some dismay within the IOC.

Corruption allegations surrounding Qatar's successful bid to host the 2022 FIFA World Cup have got alarming bells ringing at the IOC ©Getty ImagesCorruption allegations surrounding Qatar's successful bid to host the 2022 FIFA World Cup have got alarming bells ringing at the IOC ©Getty Images

They are said to be viewing the crisis over Qatar with "serious concern" as Blatter is also a leading figure in the Olympic Movement.

Petrified at the prospect of being drawn into the current FIFA imbroglio after their own Games-changing votes-for-bungs corruption scandal over Salt Lake City in 2002, the Lausanne lakesiders are keeping an anxious eye on the machinations surrounding the wily FIFA President.

They must be embarrassed over his allegations that racism is behind criticism of the decision award the 2022 World Cup to Qatar, especially as Blatter has an Olympic ally in this issue in Sheikh Ahmad Al-Fahad, influential President of the Association  of National Olympic Committees (ANOC).

He, too, claims "racism" is behind the latest claims made in London's Sunday Times that the Qatari Mohamed Bin Hammam, the former FIFA vice-president, already banned for life after an earlier corruption scandal, dished out some £3 million in bribes to get  his nation the 2022 tournament.

As insidethegames has reported, some of those alleged to have trousered "bungs" have strong links with the Olympic Movement, notably Issa Hayatou, the Cameroonian who is both a FIFA vice-president and IOC member, and former Burundi Football Federation President Lydia Nsekera, who is alleged to have been one of the 25 African football officials to have received gifts worth $5,000 at a special meeting in Kuala Lumpur.

Former Burundi Football Federation President Lydia Nsekera, like Sepp Blatter an IOC member, is among those implicated in the Qatar 2022 corruption scandal ©Getty ImagesFormer Burundi Football Federation President Lydia Nsekera, like Sepp Blatter an IOC member, is among those implicated in the Qatar 2022 corruption scandal ©Getty Images

Interestingly Blatter, who says he intends  to stand for re-election next year, when he will, be 79, is also behind a move to scrap the age limit of 80 for IOC membership, calling the current ruling - introduced after Salt Lake - "an act of discrimination."

Changes implemented in the wake of the Salt Lake City' bribery scandal, when ten members were either expelled or resigned and ten others reprimanded or sanctioned,  mandated that IOC members must resign at 70 if they joined from 1999 onwards.

Members who joined before 1999 have an age limit of 80. Blatter became ex-officio IOC member in 1999, before the new rules came into force that year, following his election to the FIFA Presidency the previous year. As things stand he must step down in two years, though a further decision on age limitation is to be taken in December.

Blatter and I go back a long way - to the early eighties in fact. I first  encountered him in a Singapore hotel room when he was "leg-man" to President Joao Havelange as FIFA's general secretary.

Actually the Swiss septuagenarian has always been a bit of a leg-man - famously a past President of the Society for the Preservation of the  Suspender!.

During my interview with Havelange - who later to resigned from the IOC shortly before he was due to face an Ethics Committee over accusations of receiving a $1 million in "commission" for broadcasting rights - we were constantly interrupted by waiters and couriers bearing gifts from local manufacturers, sponsors and businesses; boxes of shirts, crates of drinks, hi-fi equipment and toiletries were stacked high against the walls, from floor to ceiling.

"I think we'll need to hire another plane to get all these home, Mr President," Blatter smirked knowingly at Havelange.

We met again in 1998, this time in his opulent Zurich emporium soon after he became FIFA President.

I had accompanied the then Sports Minister Tony Banks who was there to discuss the potential England World Cup bid. For an hour or so Blatter provided a master-class in glib evasion and self-aggrandisement. "Slippery sod, ain't he." sniffed Banks, never one to mince words, as we left.

Plus ca change.

A shame we can't have surefooted Seb rather than slippery Sepp in charge of world football.

Alan  Hubbard is an award-winning  sports columnist for The Independent on Sunday and a former sports editor of The Observer. He has covered a total of 16 Summer and Winter Games, 10 Commonwealth Games, several football World Cups and world title fights from Atlanta to Zaire.

Nick Butler: Balotelli is one of many mavericks who can complete or disrupt a winning team

Nick Butler
Nick ButlerWhen Mario Balotelli leapt above Gary Cahill at the far post to head home what was ultimately Italy's winning goal in a 2-1 victory over England in both countries' opening match of the 2014 FIFA World Cup in Brazil on Saturday (June 14), it was a deserved reward for manager Cesare Prandelli's loyalty in backing a precocious player capable of single-handedly winning - or losing - a game.

For like many World Cup stars before him Balotelli belongs to a prestigious club of maverick sports-people who are renowned for behaving in a spontaneous and unorthodox way on and off the pitch.

This may seem a strange comment considering the striker performed a consummate team role against England. He conformed perfectly to his manager's plans and revealed little trace of the trademark eccentricity and ill-discipline that has dogged his career. With the 23-year-old having recently proposed, to equally flamboyant Belgian model girlfriend Fanny Neguesha, there are signs that he may be calming down in more ways than one.

But I would be surprised if this happens completely because, during three seasons in the Premier League with Manchester City before leaving for AC Milan, Balotelli proved to be the ultimate maverick player.

On the pitch this was illustrated by a string of brilliant goals and brainless red cards as well as the iconic moment when he lifted back his top to reveal a shirt emblazoned with the words "Why Always Me" after scoring a vital goal in the Manchester derby in 2011.

Away from the pitch, we saw darts thrown at youth team players, fireworks set off in a bathroom, a drive into a female prison "for a look around", and, my personal favourite, an attempt to pay off thousands of pounds worth of student fines after a spontaneous appearance at a university library.

And that is just scratching the surface.

Mario Balotelli performed the perfect team role against England on Saturday ©AFP/Getty ImagesItaly's Mario Balotelli performed the perfect team role against England on Saturday
©AFP/Getty Images



To an extent mavericks are seen in all walks of life, outside as well as inside the sports world. There is always one person who attempts to work outside the box and relies on instinct and talent rather than time honoured practices. It is a way to be noticed in an increasingly competitive marketplace as much as anything else.

Yet in team sports such as football, where matches are invariably decided by a moment of genius or a dreadful blunder, they are more common than most.

Balotelli indeed belongs to a club of players stretching back generations, with Zlatan Ibrahimović, Paul Gascoigne, Diego Maradona, George Best and Garrincha among other noteworthy members.

But in the ruthlessly professional age of sport today where everything is choreographed and regulated, it is arguable that mavericks are a dying breed.

The decision to omit another Manchester City star in Samir Nasri from France's final World Cup squad certainly suggested this, with French coach Didier Deschamps concluding that Nasri's undoubted footballing talent was outweighed by the adverse effects of his presence.

When at a press briefing to unveil the new British Cycling Performance Pathway last month, a system based on fulfilling scrupulously formidable physical and mental standards every year, there was one question which appeared to rattle the officials present.

"What happens to those that don't meet certain standards but are still hugely talented, the unorthodox ones?"

The case of Dan Martin suggests not too much. A Birmingham-born climbing specialist who was abandoned by the track-focused British in the early-2000s, Martin instead took up Irish citizenship and has gone on to become a leading rider on the professional road circuit who won stage nine of last year's Tour de France.

In recent weeks this has been seen again with the, still unconfirmed, non-selection of Sir Bradley Wiggins for next month's edition of the Tour. Although brilliant, Sir Bradley is a wildcard, a maverick who cannot be relied upon to following the rules, and particularly those of his bitter rival and teammate Chris Froome.

Sir Bradley Wiggins (right) is one so called maverick individual who has missed out in favour of a more reliable teammate ©Getty ImagesSir Bradley Wiggins (right) is one so called maverick individual who has missed out in favour of a more reliable teammate ©Getty Images


For a team which like to control all of the variables just like they control the pace of the peloton, this has been deemed acceptable and the 2012 champion seems certain to miss out on selection for the second successive year. Some believe that the team have an obligation to select all of their star names for the benefit of the spectators, but to Team Sky their only obligation is to win the race for the third year in a row.

Another great example of how, or how not, to accommodate a maverick figure in a team comes in cricket with English batsman Kevin Pietersen.

Like Sir Bradley, Pietersen has always had a knack for winding up his teammates as well as his rivals, but was invariably accommodated in the team due to his frequent ability to play world-class and match-winning innings. But in 2012 things came to a head in a series against his birth-country South Africa. After hitting a trademark century in the second test, it was alleged Pietersen had sent defamatory text messages about his teammates to several South African opponents, and he was dropped in the "best interests" of the team after refusing to apologise.

Although the 33-year-old was subsequently "reintegrated" into the team, he was dropped again and later announced his international retirement in the wake of England's 5-0 Ashes humiliation in Australia last winter.

It had been decided once and for all the team were better off without rather than with their most talented, yet divisive, player.

When considering Kevin Pietersen, selectors had to balance his match-winning genius with his divisive personality ©Getty ImagesWhen considering Kevin Pietersen, selectors had to balance his match-winning genius with his divisive personality ©Getty Images



So a similar decision to the one taken by Deschamps before the World Cup. Although the decision to omit Nasri seems to have been greeted with almost unanimous approval in France, for me it was strange because Nasri has not been a controversial figure at either Arsenal or Manchester City in the many years he has spent with them in the Premier League.

So is it the treatment of the maverick player by the coach that is key?

This was certainly suggested by Ibrahimović in his hugely entertaining autobiography I am Zlatan, which outlines every distinguishable characteristic of a truly maverick player. The Swede reaps praise on some managers he played under, such as Fabio Capello and Jose Mourinho, who managed to control and coax the best out of him with a disciplinarian approach, but was scathing of others, notably Barcelona boss Pep Guardiola, after they proved unable to do this.

It is a matter of opinion whether it is the responsibility of managers to resolve these situations or the responsibility of players to fit in and behave themselves no matter what.

But despite the best efforts of bodies like British Cycling, it is hard to see maverick players being eradicated from professional sport completely. For me, it remains the ultimate challenge to harness their talents and, if done correctly, the benefits will come with more goals such as Balotelli's beautifully headed winner against England.

And, perhaps more than everything else, their presence alongside blander and more media-savvy teammates adds to the excitement for us spectators, and increases the unpredictable and dramatic nature of sport today.

Nick Butler is a reporter for insidethegames. To follow him on Twitter click here.

David Owen: Should the IOC be worried about Brazil 2014-style industrial action during Rio 2016’s dash for the line and how can it avert any threat?

David OwenOne is wary of speaking too soon, but at long last it seems the football is taking over in Brazil.

The Netherlands' extraordinary 5-1 demolition of Spain's team of teams - a scoreline that no-one saw coming, outside perhaps Dutch (and soon-to-be Manchester United) coach Louis van Gaal's inner sanctum - was just the sort of result organisers needed to expunge the negative press and lurid images that have dominated the build-up to the tournament for more than a year.

It seems a good time to pause for a minute to take stock of any lessons the International Olympic Committee (IOC) - which, as we know, needs to preside over its own global sporting showcase in Brazil in two years' time - can take from the South American country's imperfect preparations for staging its first World Cup for two generations.

One area where I would think Gilbert Felli, the deeply unflash and hugely experienced IOC official appointed by IOC President Thomas Bach to keep close tabs on preparations, must be asking hard questions is in the field of labour relations.

The possibility of strikes by those working on projects for the Rio 2016 Games, including the Olympic Village pictured in 2012, is one that needs to be dealt with ©AFP/Getty ImagesThe possibility of strikes by those working on projects for the Rio 2016 Games, including the Olympic Village pictured in 2012, is one that needs to be dealt with ©AFP/Getty Images



Prestige sports competitions can, of course, make tempting targets for union organisers looking for levers to ratchet up the terms and conditions under which their members provide their labour.

I remember in particular the 1998 World Cup in France, when a pilots' strike went very close to the wire.

Even by those standards though, the tactics deployed by some workers' organisers in Brazil this week, emboldened perhaps by the knowledge that a significant proportion of the population was behind them, would be enough to give any mega-event organiser cold shivers.

First, a threatened strike by São Paulo metro workers, who had only just returned to work, on the day the city was hosting the World Cup's opening match between Brazil and Croatia was averted only at the last moment.

Then some groups of airport workers in Rio de Janeiro, the future Olympic and Paralympic host-city, did actually stage a slowdown and block a road in pursuit of a five per cent pay claim.

Is there a danger that this brand of brinkmanship might now plague the remaining countdown to the 2016 Games, a period in which city, state and national authorities face an unremitting race against the clock to be ready for the supreme logistical challenge that the Olympics represents?

My strong presumption would be that the answer to this is Yes, in which case the question becomes, Is there anything Felli and his colleagues and allies can do about it?

One possible course of action is suggested by an interview I conducted recently with Peter Ueberroth, the man who embodies the unexpected success of the 1984 Los Angeles Olympics and Paralympics - an event staged in a period when the power of trade unions was a much bigger issue than today, at least over much of the fully-industrialised world.

A deal was put in place well in advance of the Los Angeles 1984 Olympic Games to ensure strike action did not affect preparations ©Getty ImagesA deal was put in place well in advance of the Los Angeles 1984 Olympic Games to ensure strike action did not affect preparations ©Getty Images



What Ueberroth told me was this - "One thing we did that was very important: we went to all the labour unions maybe five years out and negotiated to pay regular, but good, rates and to use union [workers] throughout our activities."

However, "Any strikes would always exclude any Olympic venue and activity.

"Everybody kept their word.

"That was a big piece of comfort and a big part of our success.

"They were very fair with us."

Clearly, Felli and Co no longer have the luxury of five years in which to make their preparations.

But it seems to me that the compressed time-scale only makes the value of such a pact more apparent, particularly when, again, strikers may receive widespread backing in the court of Brazilian public opinion.

The last thing those overseeing, for example, construction at the Deodoro complex need, in a situation when every second counts, is the ever-present threat of workers walking off the job.

The World Cup has become a focus for strikes and protests, and there is no doubt the IOC is watching developments with interest ©Getty ImagesThe World Cup has become a focus for strikes and protests, and there is no doubt the IOC is watching developments with interest ©Getty Images



Yet the more pressing the deadlines, the bigger the stick that is placed in union leaders' hands.

Perhaps the powers-that-be have already negotiated the sort of deal that Ueberroth outlined and that underpinned Los Angeles 1984's against-the-odds success.

Let us hope this is the case or that, if it isn't, Felli can bang the necessary heads together to produce one covering the remaining period.

The troubled prelude to the decade's first great Brazilian festival of sport would strongly suggest that some protection from the potentially highly damaging consequences of opportunistic but eminently understandable industrial disputes is badly needed.

David Owen worked for 20 years for the Financial Times in the United States, Canada, France and the UK. He ended his FT career as sports editor after the 2006 World Cup and is now freelancing, including covering the 2008 Beijing Olympics, the 2010 World Cup and London 2012. Owen's Twitter feed can be accessed here.

Philip Barker: How Olympic gold led to World Cup glory for Uruguay

Philip BarkerThe last time the World Cup was held in Brazil, the winners were Uruguay. Their 2-1 victory over the host nation in the decisive match in 1950 was a shock of seismic proportions for the Brazilians who made up most of a 200,000-plus crowd in Rio de Janeiro's Maracana Stadium.

Known as "La Celeste" because of their sky blue shirts, it was the second time Uruguay had been on top of the football world. In the Twenties their exciting brand of play swept them to back to back Olympic gold in 1924 and 1928. This gave them the impetus to host the first World Cup. The tournament staged in 1930 had its problems, but, carried on a tide of national fervour, the Uruguayan team fulfilled a nation's dream and became the first official world champions.

Perhaps their success should not have been a surprise. They had dominated the early years of the Copa America in both unofficial and official competitions. By the early Twenties they were ready to join the world governing body FIFA.

Dr Enrique Buero, Minister Plenipotentiary for Uruguay in Switzerland, was entrusted with making sure the application would be successful. FIFA Secretary Cornelis Hirschmann was soon able to write, "I expect that the definite affiliation will be pronounced in a few days."

Hirschmann was as good as his word. The Uruguayans were now part of the global football family. The following year, the Olympics were to be held in Paris and they sailed for Europe to take part. They were the first South Americans to do so.

The Uruguayan team arriving in Spain for a series of warm-up games before their first Olympic campaign ©Uruguayan Football AssociationThe Uruguayan team arriving in Spain for a series of warm-up games before their first Olympic campaign ©Uruguayan Football Association




Their officials had  arranged nine warm-up matches in Spain. These were designed first and foremost to pay for the trip. When they arrived in Vigo, crowds thronged the streets just to catch a glimpse of the players who described it as "an unforgettable welcome". They scored three without reply to beat Celta Vigo and took half the gate money. They won a second match and then headed to Bilbao by train. There, they beat the Basques and swept through La Coruna and Madrid still undefeated.

By the time they arrived in the Olympic city of Paris, they had earned plenty in gate receipts but importantly, they were also battle hardened and acclimatised to European conditions. They installed themselves in the Chateau de Argenteuil to make their final preparations for the most important competition any of them had ever played.

When they took the field against Yugoslavia, they carried the French tricolour as well as their own flag, but were disappointed to see empty terraces. Pedro Cea and Hector Scarone both scored twice as they won 7-0 in a blistering start.

In their next match, they beat the United States with a first half hat-trick from Pedro Petrone.

It was not until the quarter-final that they conceded a goal. Against host nation France they replied with five of their own in front of packed stands in the Stade de Colombes. Scarone and Petrone both scored twice this time.

In the semi-final, the Uruguayans trailed to The Netherlands but came back to win. The match had turned on a disputed penalty converted by Petrone. After the match the Dutch put in an appeal which proved unsuccessful.

When the Uruguayans learned that Dutch referee Johannes Mutters had been assigned the final against Switzerland they put in a protest of their own. The following day the jury headed by FIFA President Jules Rimet appointed Marcel Slawick, a Frenchman, instead and the Uruguayans were satisfied.

Uruguay's Olympic squad looked in a relaxed mood at their Paris accommodation ©Uruguayan Football AssociationUruguay's Olympic squad looked in a relaxed mood at their Paris accommodation ©Uruguayan Football Association




For the final some 60,000 crammed into the stadium at Colombes, thousands more were locked outside.

An early Petrone goal put Uruguay in front. They scored twice more after half time and the gold medal was theirs.

Back in Montevideo, crowds had started gathering outside the newspaper offices each match day from early morning to wait for news. When the results came through they were "greeted with an uproar of cheers, rockets, foghorns and whistles." Victory brought the city to a standstill.

The official Uruguayan federation report identified the reason for their success. "The morale of the team was excellent with perfect discipline."

Before they returned home, the players visited the tourist spots in Paris and also went to the tomb of the Unknown Soldier where they laid a wreath.

In defence of their title, the Uruguayans were just as thorough. They met to discuss how best to prepare their players and in particular to offset the adverse effects of a long sea voyage. The 1928 Olympics were to be held in Amsterdam.

Uruguay were drawn against the Netherlands to renew a rivalry that had started in the 1924 tournament. This time of course the Dutch were the host nation. The locals queued round the block for tickets and in front of a crowd of over 27,000, Uruguay won with a goal in each half. The referee was John Langenus, later destined to referee the first World Cup final.

Uruguay took control of their quarter-final against the Germans before half time. Petrone completed his hat-trick in the second half but their victory was marred by the dismissal of skipper Jose Nasazzi. The Germans had two players sent off.

In the last four, Uruguay came from behind to beat Italy 3-2.

The referee appointed for the final was Mutters, the very official the Uruguayans had objected to so vehemently four years previously. This time however, there was no protest.

The Uruguayans defend during the 1928 Olympic final in Amsterdam against Argentina ©Uruguayan Football AssociationThe Uruguayans defend during the 1928 Olympic final in Amsterdam against Argentina ©Uruguayan Football Association




Their opponents Argentina had scored no fewer than 23 goals in three matches en route to the final. Uruguay led through a first half goal from Petrone, Manuel Ferreira levelled after half time to take the game into extra time. There was no further scoring. There were no penalty shootouts in those days, the teams simply came back three days later for a replay.

At half time it was still one apiece in the replay but Scarone scored what proved to be the decisive goal midway through the second half. Back in Montevideo, the fans took to the streets once again to celebrate. They were not even put off by torrential rain.

Everyone was acutely aware that the best players in the world were now turning professional and soon the thoughts turned towards the possibility of a world tournament that would be open to all.

After winning their second straight Olympic gold, the Uruguay squad had plenty of reason to cheer ©Uruguayan Football AssociationAfter winning their second straight Olympic gold, the Uruguay squad had plenty of reason to cheer ©Uruguayan Football Association



FIFA had already set up a commission to examine the problem. When the group presented their conclusions, Jules Rimet solemnly announced "FIFA is now facing a new era."

The IOC Executive Board met before the Amsterdam Olympics in 1928, and noted that "FIFA is contemplating holding a World Championship open to Amateurs and Professionals, but this would have no reference to the Olympic Games."

Double Olympic success had nonetheless given Uruguay real standing in world football and Dr Buero was by now an influential FIFA vice-president. He was concerned that Montevideo did not yet have a suitable stadium. He was also worried that that the crowds would not turn up in sufficient numbers to watch, especially for matches in midweek.

His countrymen were not to be put off - 1930 was to be Uruguay's national centenary. This they reasoned would be a perfect way to celebrate. They enlisted the support of other members of the South American football confederation (CONMEBOL) and promised "to pay the travel costs and board and lodging for 20 players (sic) during the tournament and an additional eight days."

The decision was made at the 1929 FIFA congress in Barcelona. Some European nations said they were interested in hosting but they also made it clear that they would not attend a tournament staged in South America. In the meantime Uruguay marshalled their support well and impressed FIFA with their enthusiasm before decision day. After the vote, a telegram sent back to Montevideo had good tidings.

"THE FOOTBALL CONGRESS HAS DECIDED THAT THE VENUE FOR THE 1930 WORLD CUP WILL BE MONTEVIDE . THE MOTION WAS BRILLIANTLY SUPPORTED BY ARGENTINA'S DELEGATE."

The tournament would have four preliminary groups, although at this stage, it was by no means certain just how many teams would take part.

Time was short. The main stadium was a massive undertaking and with less than a year to prepare, it needed 500 workers working three shifts a day. The largest grandstand was to be named "Olympic" and the terraces at either end of the ground were named Colombes (Paris 1924) and Amsterdam (1928).

Estadio Centenario was a huge undertaking and not quite ready for the start of the 1930 tournament, but it played host to Uruguay winning the first football World Cup ©Uruguayan Football AssociationEstadio Centenario was a huge undertaking and not quite ready for the start of the 1930 tournament, but it played host to Uruguay winning the first football World Cup 
©Uruguayan Football Association



Only 13 teams entered and to the disappointment of the host nation and FIFA President Jules Rimet, France Belgium and Yugoslavia were joined by Romania who had an unusual benefactor. King Carol was a keen sports fan who not only chose the players but persuaded their employers to grant leave of absence.

Rimet took the World Cup trophy, (later to bear his name) when he boarded the SS Conte Verde to Montevideo.

Bad weather had delayed construction of the stadium. It was not ready for the start of the tournament so early matches were played at other grounds in Montevideo. The Estadio Centenario was finally opened in time for Uruguay's first match. They beat Peru and Romania to qualify for the last four without so much as conceding a goal or dropping a point. The core of their team had been part of the Olympic experience and in Jose Andrade, they had one of the finest players of any generation.

In the semi-final, Uruguay beat Yugoslavia 6-1. Argentina won the other semi final against the USA by the same margin to set up a local derby to end all local derbies. At stake, nothing less than the championship of the world.

Thousands made the crossing from Argentina. The gates were opened at eight in the morning, by noon the ground was packed.

The intense atmosphere filtered through to the players. The sides could not agree which ball to use so each country provided their own for 45 minutes.

Argentina led 2-1 at half time but the host nation came back in the second half. Cea equalised, then a spectacular 30 yarder from Victoriano Iriarte put them in front and the victory was sealed in the final moments by Hector Castro

As they celebrated, the Uruguayan flag was unfurled at the top of the great tower which dominated the stadium.

Two Olympic Gold medals and a World Cup was a fabulous return from a golden decade but they felt snubbed by the absence of so many European teams. Uruguay did not defend their crown in Italy in 1934, nor did they appear in France for the 1938 World Cup.

Their grand return in 1950 ended in glory but they have never lifted the trophy since, although they did reach the semi-finals in South Africa four years ago.

Born in Hackney, a stone's throw from the 2012 Olympic Stadium, Philip Barker has worked as a television journalist for 25 years. He began his career with Trans World Sport, then as a reporter for Skysports News and the ITV breakfast programme. A regular Olympic pundit on BBC Radio, Sky News and Talksport, he is associate editor of the Journal of Olympic History, has lectured at the National Olympic Academy and contributed extensively to Team GB publications. To follow him on Twitter click here.

Mike Rowbottom: The burning World Cup question: Is Big Head the Special One?

Mike Rowbottom
Mike Rowbottom ©insidethegamesIt all kicks off today. You know what I'm talking about.

Small children are trailing through my local supermarket wearing yellow and green shirts because of it.

The BBC's Mark Lawrenson is having to make more predictions than Nostradamus because of it.

Google's characters, with Sugarloaf Mountain behind them, are bobbing up and down on Copacabana Beach because of it.

A semi-final at the Hockey World Cup in The Hague has just been re-scheduled in order not to clash with it.

Today, in the Arena de São Paulo, the 2014 FIFA World Cup finals get underway, and for a few precious days, the possibility will remain alive in 32 countries that the trophy first picked up by West Germany's Franz Beckenbauer in 1974 - following Brazil's annexation of the old trophy for all time through a third victory - may yet be lifted by a man in their nation's colours.

Neymar, Brazil's star turn, warms up with his team mates ahead of their opening World Cup match against Croatia ©AFP/Getty ImagesNeymar, Brazil's star turn, warms up with his team mates ahead of their opening World Cup match against Croatia ©AFP/Getty Images

Lawrenson is not the only ex-player and/or pundit to suggest that Croatia - who will play the host nation in the opening match - will find those hopes have been significantly dimmed by the time today turns into tomorrow.

Despite all the current allegations, suspicions and frustrations involved in the award of the 2022, and even the 2018 World Cup finals, and despite the cynical and at times morally corrupt machinations of football's international governing body, and despite the wearisome resilience of the man at FIFA's head, Sepp Blatter - the 78-year-old Swiss who is to seek yet another last tour of duty in defiance of calls to resign from some members of his organisation - there is still a primal excitement to be had from the moments before the only sporting event to rival the Olympics starts rolling.

Assuming Brazil get to kick off, it will probably be their forward, Fred, who first lays a boot on the latest rebranded, redesigned and of course re-marketed footballs designed specifically for the tournament. By rights, given how FIFA operated in recent years, they should move in mysterious ways.

Every four years, just as with the Olympics, the World Cup finals exert a profound influence on the whole sporting universe. Like a black hole, they exert a huge gravitational pull upon the consciousness of the average sporting observer.

For instance, the news that Sir Bradley Wiggins, who has already ruled out his involvement in the Tour de France this year despite the lack of official confirmation, will be cycling at the Glasgow 2014 Commonwealth Games, certainly on the road and possibly on the track too, is terrific.

Sir Bradley Wiggins en route to victory in the recent Tour of California. He reckons he won't get a ride at the Tour de France, however, and so is now contemplating competing on the road and maybe the track to at the Glasgow 2014 Games. Good news - but not top news ©Getty ImagesSir Bradley Wiggins en route to victory in the recent Tour of California. He reckons he won't get a ride at the Tour de France, however, and so is now contemplating competing on the road and maybe the track to at the Glasgow 2014 Games. Good news - but not top news ©Getty Images

And the news that Olympic 200 metres champion Allyson Felix is heading back to full fitness after injury, as evidenced by her first IAAF Diamond League victory of the season in Oslo yesterday, is terrific.

And the news that Andy Murray has got off to a winning start at Queen's Club under the guidance of his new coach Amelie Mauresmo, is terrific.

But it is all background music right now. Brazil is sport's epicentre. And the good news for followers of the home team is that they can already start celebrating a home victory - that is, if Big Head, the "psychic turtle", is to be trusted.

Franz Beckenbauer became the first captain to get his hands on the new World Cup back in 1974. Maybe Big Head, the psychic turtle, already knows who will take possession of it when the World Cup finals in Brazil come to a close ©AFP/Getty ImagesFranz Beckenbauer became the first captain to get his hands on the new World Cup back in 1974. Maybe Big Head, the psychic turtle, already knows who will take possession of it when the World Cup finals in Brazil come to a close ©AFP/Getty Images

Footage available on the internet shows the turtle in a pool delighting locals with its choice of direction after being set the task of predicting the opening match by choosing which of three pieces of fish to go for first, with one piece being suspended under a Brazilian flag, another under a Croatian flag, and the last under a football to indicate a drawn game.

Big Head swam unerringly to the left for a first go at the fish under the host flag, thus confirming that the home side will win in São Paulo today. What a relief that must be to the many millions of Brazil supporters awaiting the match.

What we need now, of course, is another predictive creature - a monkey, perhaps, or political pollster - to emerge and offer a firm indication that Brazil are about to be beaten by Croatia. That was the scenario, after all, which operated with such success during the last World Cup finals in South Africa four years ago.

On one level the 2010 World Cup final was contested by two football teams, Spain and The Netherlands.

But at a deeper level, it was a struggle between an octopus and a parakeet. Or rather, it was an octopus and a Malaysian parakeet against a Singapore parakeet.

As the World Cup finals progressed, the significant action in stadiums all around South Africa was supplemented by activity in the Sea Life centre at Oberhausen, in western Germany, where growing numbers of media representatives witnessed Paul the Octopus and his spectacular, tentacular ability to pick winners.

Paul the Octopus, the German-based mollusc which correctly predicted all seven of its home nation's results at the 2010 World Cup finals. Here the seer has selected a clam from the Serbian container, indicating a German defeat. Germany lost this match 1-0 ©AFP/Getty ImagesPaul the Octopus, the German-based mollusc which correctly predicted all seven of its home nation's results at the 2010 World Cup finals. Here the seer has selected a clam from the Serbian container, indicating a German defeat. Germany lost this match 1-0
©AFP/Getty Images


Unerringly, the German resident predicted all seven of the national team's results in South Africa - even the 1-0 defeat to Serbia in the group stages - by choosing between clams housed in containers bearing the colours of contending teams.

His choice of the Spanish, rather than the German mussel before the semi-finals precipitated a home reaction so stormy that it might even have rocked the quiet waters in which he had happily - as far as anyone could judge - dwelled.

After Germany's 1-0 defeat, there were suggestions from disgruntled fans that Paul's prediction may have affected some of the more superstitious members of the team, and German newspapers demanded that he should pay the penalty most befitting traitorous molluscs: "Throw him in the frying pan!" suggested the Berliner Kurier.

Paul's subsequent prediction that Germany would beat Uruguay in the third and fourth place match may just have saved his tentacles - although he had back-up in the form of the Spanish President, who apparently vouchsafed his safety.

When it came to the Big Decision - determining who would actually win the World Cup - Paul, with every appearance of composure, selected once again the clam from the container adorned with the Spanish flag. After which the 1-0 Spanish win, thanks to an Iniesta goal, was no more than a foregone conclusion.

Andres Iniesta of Spain scores the only goal of the 2010 World Cup final against The Netherlands. Spain had to win - Paul the Octopus had indicated they would ©AFP/Getty ImagesAndres Iniesta of Spain scores the only goal of the 2010 World Cup final against The Netherlands. Spain had to win - Paul the Octopus had indicated they would
©AFP/Getty Images


Paul's certainty was mirrored by that of Meena Kutti an eight-year-old green parakeet living in the Malaysian capital of Kuala Lumpur.

For many years, Meena had restricted predictions to minor matters such as marriage and business fortune. But after turning attention to the pressing matter of the World Cup, the feathered sage earned new acclaim.

Presented with a choice of envelopes representing The Netherlands and Spain, Meena's beak went straight to the one marked "La Furia Roja" - The Red Fury. In other words, Spain.

Mani, another parakeet with a reputation for mystical gifts, so nearly played a blinder in its home in Singapore's Little India neighbourhood as - in a process involving the choice of cards bearing the names of matched teams - it correctly predicted all four World Cup semi-finalists, and Spain's subsequent win over Germany. But when it came to the final the 13-year-old Feathered One put his beak in it and tipped The Netherlands.

Ah well. For every winner there has to be a loser. So bring it all on, Brazil...

Mike Rowbottom, one of Britain's most talented sportswriters, covered the London 2012 Olympics and Paralympics as chief feature writer for insidethegames, having covered the previous five summer Games, and four winter Games, for The Independent. He has worked for the Daily Mail, The Times, The Observer, The Sunday Correspondent and The Guardian. His latest book Foul Play – the Dark Arts of Cheating in Sport (Bloomsbury £12.99) is available at the insidethegames.biz shop. To follow him on Twitter click here.

David Owen: Why USOC chairman’s comments on who should choose Olympic host-city might prove counter-productive

Duncan Mackay
David OwenWhen I read my colleague Emily Goddard's piece this week reporting that the United States Olympic Committee (USOC) chairman was calling for International Olympic Committee (IOC) members, in effect, to be stripped of their right to vote for Games host-cities, I could scarcely believe my eyes.

Yes, I can kind of understand why, if we assume that Probst sees part of his remit as maximising the chances of the Summer Games returning to the US for the first time since Atlanta 1996, he might think this.

After all, the IOC membership in its wisdom turned its back on consecutive US bids for 2012 and 2016, the latter in particularly humiliating circumstances.

And I would think that the IOC's Executive Board - which Probst told Sport Business Journal he wants to decide where the Games are held - would be very likely to accord more weight than the membership as a whole to the argument that the high proportion of the Movement's revenues derived from US companies means it is high time once again to bestow the Olympics' flagship product on the land of its prime benefactors.

What escapes me is the upside of Probst going public and actually articulating his thoughts - particularly at this precise moment, when FIFA, probably the world's second-most powerful sports body, is under sustained heavy fire for awarding the 2022 World Cup to Qatar, a decision made by an Executive Committee of 22 men.

You don't have to believe any of the allegations plaguing the Gulf state and its planners - whose closest rival in the 2022 race was, incidentally, the US - to conclude that the IOC's modus operandi is probably better.

FIFA's decision by its ruling Executive Committee to award Qatar the 2022 World Cup has led to widespread allegations of corruption ©Getty ImagesFIFA's decision by its ruling Executive Committee to award Qatar the 2022 World Cup has led to widespread allegations of corruption ©Getty Images

Indeed, FIFA President (and IOC member) Sepp Blatter himself subsequently proposed a reform that would extend the electorate in future World Cup-hosting contests to all 200-plus of the football body's member associations.

This, in case you missed it, is what Probst is reported to have said:

""I'd like to see the [IOC] Executive Board decide where the Olympic Games are held," Probst...told Sport Business Journal.

"I will probably get in trouble for saying this, but they are supposedly the most sophisticated and knowledgeable people in the membership, so I would like to see the [Executive Board] have more of a say.""

Thanks to an explanation offered by Probst in a conference call with reporters on Tuesday, we now have more of an insight into the circumstances in which the comment was made.

It seems Probst was asked at a Sport Business Journal conference what he might want to change about the IOC.

"I served that up as, you know, 'Here's an idea, here's a thought'," he explained.

"Upon further thinking about it, it might not be such a terrible idea to have the Executive Board get down to a couple of cities and then put the vote between those two cities to the full membership.

"These are all things that are just ideas at this point.

"These are things for the working groups to consider...

"That was said in the spirit of being more efficient and cost-effective than we may have been in the past."

As Probst's reference to working groups makes plain, it is blue-sky-thinking time inside the IOC at the moment, with all and sundry being encouraged to chip in ideas to President Thomas Bach's Olympic Agenda 2020 initiative.

So from that perspective, Probst's timing is more understandable.

A working group to help frame key recommendations relating to bidding procedure has even been set up under the chairmanship of John Coates, the senior Australian IOC member.

While Probst is not on it, Angela Ruggiero, another (increasingly highly thought-of) US IOC member, is.

As the USOC chairman also made clear on Tuesday, the conclusions of Coates's working group will have a bearing on whether the US ultimately decides to enter the race to host the 2024 Summer Olympic and Paralympic Games, the next one available.

"We clearly want to see the output from that working group and what changes are adopted before we push the Go button on formalising a bid for 2024," he said.

"Yes, that work is going to be important to our ultimate decision."

The last American bid, from Chicago for the 2016 Olympics and Paralympics, ended in humiliation when they were voted out by the IOC in the first round of voting ©Getty ImagesThe last American bid, from Chicago for the 2016 Olympics and Paralympics, ended in humiliation when they were voted out by the IOC in the first round of voting ©Getty Images

Taking all this into account, I still cannot fathom what was to be gained, from a US viewpoint, from Probst going public on his thinking at this time.

Indeed, I can think of three ways in which the remarks might prove counter-productive.

1) If he doesn't get his way - and I have so far discerned little indication that he will, even if I would not be surprised to see "guidance" offered to members by the Executive Board and Evaluation Commissions become, in future, a little more pointed - Probst's comments give IOC members another excuse not to vote for the US candidate-city in the 2024 race.

2) If they share my analysis on Point 1, European cities such as St Petersburg, Rome and Paris - who would make formidable rivals - might conclude that 2024 is not a foregone conclusion after all and throw their hats into the ring.

3) The remarks could contribute to undermining the progress made since the 2016 bid fiasco in dissipating the air of anti-Americanism that has been detectable in and around the membership for much of the 13-year period I have been covering the Movement. Probst himself, as well as USOC chief executive Scott Blackmun and IOC members Anita DeFrantz and Ruggiero have been key players in fostering this positive change. As one European Olympic observer told me recently, "The US has reacted better to 2016 than France did to [Paris's defeat in] 2012."

As things stand, this is at worst an isolated lapse.

The 2024 Summer Olympic and Paralympic host-city will not be chosen until 2017.

USOC chairman Larry Probst, seen here with Russian President Vladimir Putin during Sochi 2014, has courted controversy by suggesting the IOC Executive Board vote for the Olympic host city rather than the full membership ©Getty ImagesUSOC chairman Larry Probst, seen here with Russian President Vladimir Putin during Sochi 2014, has courted controversy by suggesting the IOC Executive Board vote for the Olympic host city rather than the full membership ©Getty Images

It remains conceivable that the US may have no serious rival, though I would expect the IOC high command to move heaven and earth to ensure this is not the case - not out of anti-Americanism, but desire to protect its bargaining position with the eventual host.

But it would be a big mistake, in my view, just at the moment when it has rediscovered the magic formula, for the US to revert to heavier-handed tactics.

Whatever the motivation for Probst's initial comments, and the circumstances in which he made them, they could hardly fail to be interpreted in some circles as a vote of no confidence in the individuals in whose hands the US's Olympic ambitions for now – still – firmly reside.

It is probably early enough in the campaign as to make little difference, but it will be harder now for Probst to complain if his apparent lack of confidence turns out to be reciprocated.

David Owen worked for 20 years for the Financial Times in the United States, Canada, France and the UK. He ended his FT career as sports editor after the 2006 World Cup and is now freelancing, including covering the 2008 Beijing Olympics, the 2010 World Cup and London 2012. Owen's Twitter feed can be accessed here.

Alan Hubbard: What sport policy in Britain might look like under a Labour Government

Alan HubbardIt has taken some time for the Opposition sports spokesperson to emerge from the shadows of Westminster but the amiable Clive Efford has now done so with some style.

With the current sports Minister Helen Grant keeping a relatively low profile, her Parliamentary spar-mate took the opportunity to raise his own with a timely keynote speech to the well-attended "sports summit" organised by the Sport and Recreation Alliance (S&RA) at Chelsea FC last week. And very impressive he was too.

An interesting chap, Efford, who if his friend Ed Miliband gets the electoral nod in 11 months time is very likely to be Britain's next sports Minister, has some street cred. A lifelong Millwall supporter and qualified football coach, the MP for Eltham in Kent is also that rarity - a former London cabbie with left wing views.

He clearly has a decent grasp of sport at grass roots level, as he demonstrated when addressing the assembled representatives of Britain's governing bodies. But we have yet to see how combative he is in dealing with sport's bigger wigs.

Clive Efford could well be Britain's next sports Minister, and he has some street cred to hold him in good stead if he is ©Getty ImagesClive Efford could well be Britain's next sports Minister, and he has some street cred to hold him in good stead if he is ©Getty Images



We recently bumped into former Tory sports Minister Hugh Robertson, now carrying the Middle East portfolio at the Foreign Office, and he laughed knowingly when we suggested that after wrangling with the FA and Premier League, sorting out Syria must be a doddle.

Until recently we had not heard a great deal about or from 47-year-old Efford, apart from the odd Westminster soundbite. Yet I suspect now that Labour's unlikely Games mistress Harriet Harman, the shadow Secretary for Culture, Media and Sport, seems to be letting him off the leash, he will become a more significant player in the increasingly vexatious game of sports politics.

There was nothing particularly contentious in what he told the S&RA but his delivery was assured in proposing a fundamental change in the culture of sport in this country which "should be stitched into our everyday lives". It went down well.

He promises there will be no "hectoring or nagging" from him should he attain office. "I can tell you from personal experience that it does not work," says the ex-taxi driver who has done the knowledge and doubtless had his share of argumentative coves in the back of his black cab.

Any new Labour Government, says Effiord, would attempt to bring some stability and coherence to sports governance. "We have seen too much of a piecemeal approach. Some of it has been a nightmare - in particular for schools sport."

He says there has to be a philosophical change towards physical education. "It should not be regarded as a bit of a break between other subjects but a necessary part of the core curriculum."

He clearly has spent some time not only doing his homework but his roadwork, assessing the needs of community sport in the drive for  greater participation. It is ridiculous, he reckons, that after hosting an Olympic Games Britain should be lagging in this direction. Well, we all agree on that.

Not too much headline-grabbing material there, though Efford does pledge that under Labour the bookies would have a harder time of it.

The betting industry will come under close scrutinty from a Labour Government, Clive Efford has pledged ©AFP/Getty ImagesThe betting industry will come under close scrutinty from a Labour Government, Clive Efford has pledged ©AFP/Getty Images



The betting industry, he says, would come under much closer scrutiny. "I find it immoral that an industry can make so much money out of sport and put so little back into it. There is an argument that their money should be used to tackle the problem of excessive gambling in sport and for investment into grass root activities."

He is also worried about the proliferating amount of alcohol advertising which seems to be "smothering" sport. "It concerns me when I see cheap packs of alcohol being been advertised in association with sport. There has to be a sensible dialogue about this. I advise the alcohol companies not to make the same mistakes as gambling."

Should Labour win next May obviously it will be "taxi for Mrs Grant" as Efford moves into her Whitehall office at the Department for Culture, Media & Sport.

But there is some speculation that the present sports Minister, installed only eight months ago, might be moved to a more senior role overseeing equalities and women's issues in the coming Government reshuffle.

I think it unlikely but should it happen there are at least two other interesting candidates for the job - both women. One is fight fan Charlotte Leslie, the feisty chair of the All Parliamentary Boxing Group, and the other Tracey Crouch, who, like Efford, is a qualified Football Association coach. She manages an all-girls team.

My guess is that Grant, who despite those early gaffes has done a quietly efficient job, will stay until May, although from now on she may find herself under somewhat less friendly fire from her opposite number.

There is speculation surrounding the future of current sports Minister Helen Grant, but she is likely to stay in post until the general election ©Getty Images for Sport EnglandThere is speculation surrounding the future of current sports Minister Helen Grant, but she is likely to stay in post until the general election ©Getty Images for Sport England



Last week's Chelsea gathering also saw something of a 'comeback' for the S&RA itself, which like Efford, has been rather in the shadows of late.

Once the CCPR (Central Council of Physical Recreation), it seemed to have become increasingly anachronistic since the heady and purposeful days of the late and much lamented Nigel Hook, a genial genius of sports politics.

What has always regarded itself as sport's own "Parliament" had lost its way a bit, slipping under the radar of the public consciousness. Excluding the media from its annual meeting last year because there were "private matters" to be discussed was not its brightest move.

Some critics suggested it was showing a questionable political bias under new rugby-playing chairman Andy Reed, a former Labour MP. Hugh Robertson certainly thought so.

But there are indications that it can regain its former status as sport's most effective "ginger group".

It is soon to appoint a new chief executive to succeed former England and Wales Cricket Board chief Tim Lamb, who has retired. Leading contender is lively acting chief executive Sallie Barker, who is among the growing galaxy of female talent in sports administration led by Liz Nichol and Debbie Jevans.

The S&RA represents over 300 sports bodies from bowls to bridge, football to tchouckball, and activities like movement and dance and cheerleading. But in terms of sports governance it is overshadowed by the two Government-funded bodies, UK Sport and Sport England, and the independent British Olympic Association.

The body's raison d'etre is fighting sport's corner from all angles, notably organising campaigns aimed at supporting the sporting community on varying issues like the work of volunteers, tax, VAT, betting in sport, playing fields, women's sport, planning permissions, the increase in police charges at sports events and licensing matters.

The conference at which Efford spoke included a valuable debate on match-fixing after the S&RA had highlighted the Government's disinclination to criminalise the offence, citing situations where despite strong evidence there has been "no appetite" for prosecutions.

It is good to see the erstwhile champion of sport punching its weight again.

But one thing still concerns me. Out of the assembly of 140 those from the ethnic minorities, who play such a major role in active sport, could be counted on the fingers of one hand - actually on one finger if you excluded the media. Alas, it was ever thus.

Hopefully the community-conscious Efford will agree that this is an issue which needs to be seriously addressed should he become the next occupant of the Ministerial chair.

Alan Hubbard is an award-winning sports columnist for The Independent on Sunday and a former sports editor of The Observer. He has covered a total of 16 Summer and Winter Games, 10 Commonwealth Games, several football World Cups and world title fights from Atlanta to Zaire.

Nick Butler: Olympics still the long-term target as netball shoots towards greater global role

Nick Butler
Nick Butler insidethegames tie 1With six weeks to go until the Commonwealth Games open in Glasgow on July 23, it is probably sports such as athletics, swimming or rugby sevens that are generating the most excitement.

But another core sport steeped in the recent history of both the Games and the Commonwealth is netball, and it is hoped that Glasgow 2014 can provide another boost for this unique discipline on the long and windy road to eventual inclusion in the Olympic Games.

As a man, I expect I am rather unusual in claiming to be a former netball player. Aged 10, our school year group was woefully short of girls so a team was formed consisting mostly of boys. This approach may have been novel, but it unfortunately failed to work as we were overpowered by taller, talented and better skilled female opponents.

It may seem strange that in an age where equality is being pushed more than ever before, there remains a sport exclusively aimed at one gender. Yet this is the central tenet of netball and the key appeal of the sport looking forward, as the International Netball Federation (INF) targets improving the number of recognised national federations from the current total of 73.

"It is probably the only truly women's sport," Jamaican Molly Rhone, who has served as INF President since 2003, tells insidethegames.

"It is a big advantage for young women to play a sport that only other women play. In lots of other sports, although many girls compete, the biggest names and biggest role-models are male, and it is great that in netball all of the role-models for young players are women.

"It is a cheap game to play and a good way to keep women active. But it is more than a great game and we think of ourselves as empowering women through sport."

New Zealand star Irene van Dyk, who announced her international retirement last week, is one top role-model ©FacebookNew Zealand star Irene van Dyk, who announced her international retirement last week, is one top role-model ©Facebook



Netball first emerged at the end of the 19th century after the sport of basketball was adopted into what was considered a more female-friendly form at an English Physical Training College, with the principal difference being that movement with the ball was banned and restricted areas of the court were established for each position.

From there it was rolled out across the British Empire, and in 1960 the INF was formed to standardise the game before the first World Championships took place in the southern English seaside town of Eastbourne three years later.

It remains essentially a sport for the Commonwealth countries, with reigning Commonwealth Games champions New Zealand and reigning world champions Australia occupying the top two places in the world rankings. England, Jamaica, Malawi, South Africa and Fiji are in positions three to seven. 

But huge effort is being made to bring the sport to new parts of the world. Israel competed at the 2013 World Youth Championships in Glasgow, for example, while Argentina will be among the participants at the Americas Federation of Netball Associations Championships in Calgary this August.

Switzerland, the United States, Taiwan and Thailand are all members of the INF, while foreign coaches are working in other parts of Latin America, such as Uruguay and Paraguay. There are more recognised countries playing the sport in Asia than anywhere else and it is hoped that participating in the South East Asian (SEA) Games, taking place from June 5 to 16 next year in Singapore, will pave the way to eventual Asian Games inclusion.

Last month, Rhone attended the netball competition at the African Youth Games in Bostwana's capital Gabarone, where the sport was featuring for the first time. 

"The crowds were great and there was a really festive atmosphere," she reported. "I hadn't seen teams from [gold medal winners] Uganda, Kenya and Zimbabwe playing before and I was really impressed with the skill levels on display. A lot of matches were really close and were decided by one goal. Many people in Botswana said they hadn't seen netball before and it was a great advert for the sport.

"What is good is that all of the English speaking countries in Africa are now playing. And if senior players from these countries are twice as good as the youth ones, then the rest of the world better watch out!"

Given the cheapness and the comparative void in established team sports for women on the continent, Africa has clearly been identified as an opportunity for netball. The INF are also aiming to help with development there away from the court, and their work with international organisation Peace and Sport in Burundi was acknowledged with an award at the 2012 Africa International Sports Convention for making a "significant contribution to peace and the promotion of sport in Africa".

Like Africa, India is another area in which netball has enjoyed recent growth ©FacebookLike Africa, India is another area in which netball has enjoyed recent growth ©Facebook




It is hoped that by steadily building this international role, and by competing in events such as the SEA Games and the African Youth Games, the long-term goal of Olympic inclusion will eventually be reached.

In 1995, netball was recognised by the International Olympic Committee and they are now a member of the Association of IOC Recognised International Sports Federations (ARISF), with Rhone having served as a Board member since May 2013.

Rhone, who was vice-captain of the Jamaican team at the 1975 World Championships before working for two decades with Air Jamaica, hopes that Olympic inclusion is something that will eventually occur by default more than by a specific campaign.

"We have a great group [in ARISF] and my comments are sought like everyone else's," she told insidethegames. "It is a vibrant forum for the non-Olympic sports and we have a voice with the IOC and with other bodies.

"I don't think netball really has a 'campaign' to get in to the Olympics - we don't have the money to do that! But we hope that in time it will just happen. I think there will come a time where they will re-examine the disciplines, and we think and hope they will include netball when they do this.

"It is great that the sport is growing. We would love to see the sport in the Olympics one day. Not in the near future but it is still an aspiration.

"Netball would definitely add something: no one can dominate because you cannot move with the ball, so it is exciting, simple to understand and good to watch."

Unsurprisingly, Rhone believes that netball should take advantage of the current drive for gender equality engulfing the Olympic Movement, but she believes the inclusion of netball would achieve this in a more natural sense than artificially altering long-established programmes in other sports to add more female events.

"There has been a lot of focus on gender equality, but I think it would be better to do this by focusing across the entire Games rather than by changing specific sports," she argues. "Some sports lend themselves better to gender equality than others. Why not enter women under their own sport?"

Molly Rhone (left), pictured at the Queen's Baton Relay event in Manchester last month, believes more women can succeed in top sporting roles ©TwitterMolly Rhone (left), pictured at the Queen's Baton Relay event in Manchester last month, believes more women can succeed in top sporting roles ©Twitter



One final opportunity that netball would provide is opportunities for women in a coaching and an administrative sense as well as in terms of participation. These are topics which have enjoyed a lot of focus recently, including during a special "Women in Sport" panel during the SportAccord Convention in Belek, Turkey, earlier this year.

As well as reinvigorating an "Auld Alliance" between France and Scotland, the fascinating unveiling yesterday of former Grand Slam champion Amélie Mauresmo as the new coach for British tennis star Andy Murray is another boost, with women coaching men something virtually unique in top-level sport today.

But Rhone believes that having the assurance they can perform top roles as successfully as their male counterparts is key, as is having a "confident approach".

"The opportunities are there for women in sport," she insists. "We cannot feel threatened and must put ourselves up.

"We need to make an impression. When running as a Board member of ARISF, I said don't vote for me because I am a women, vote for me for what I will do.

"We have to have responsibility that we can deliver."

It is this approach that has got Rhone and netball where it is today and they must also be confident of more success in future months, at Glasgow 2014 and beyond. 

Nick Butler is a reporter for insidethegames. To follow him on Twitter click here.

Peter John L. Thompson: Celebrating the 60th anniversary of the women's sub five-minute mile

Peter John L. ThompsonMany of you are aware of the 60th anniversary of the breaking of the four-minute barrier for the mile last month. On May 6, 1954, Roger Bannister ran the mile in 3 min 59.4sec, a time that was previously thought physiologically and mentally beyond the scope of man.

Later in May 1954, the world mile record was again under assault in England. But this was not Iffley Road, Oxford. This was the Perry Barr Stadium in Birmingham and the Midland Championships on May 29. The runners were assembled on a rain-soaked cinder track at the start of the mile race, knowing that one of their number was to attempt to break the world record that day. They were also aware that this athlete had won the Championship's 880 yards just 45 minutes earlier, establishing a British record.

Brought to the start line, the report of the starter's gun echoed around the Stadium like a whip crack, reminding those assembled, athletes and spectators alike, of the purpose for their meeting. As the runners set off, it took only a couple of hundred yards before a tall, elegant runner moved fluidly to the front of the field and assumed an ever-increasing lead, "the game was afoot" and Diane Leather had once again placed the world mile record under threat.

Not for this athlete the company of opponents or pacemakers. Leather was simply miles ahead in terms of her development and potential and raced with the wisdom of that potential. As the laps passed by, her pace carried her far away from the field so that the crowd, through the announcer, became increasingly aware that the five-minute barrier for the mile was achievable.

Diane Leather did not need the company of opponents or pacemakers to push her towards record-breaking times ©Getty ImagesDiane Leather did not need the company of opponents or pacemakers to push her towards record-breaking times ©Getty Images




By the end of the mile, Diane was 160 yards ahead of the second place finisher, and broke the tape in a time of 4:59.6, becoming the first female runner to complete a mile in under five minutes. This barrier was broken just 23 days after Roger Bannister had broken the four-minute barrier in Oxford.

Leather is probably the best British athlete you may never have heard of. And, if you have heard of her, you may not be fully aware of just how great was her talent and achievement over such a range of distances. Her relatively brief career saw her equal the world best for 440 yards and set world best performances for 1,500 metres twice - and was the first woman to run under 4:30.0 - and the mile on five occasions.

At that time, these performances were all classified as world best performances, rather than world records, as the only women's individual middle distances recognised by the International Amateur Athletic Federation - as they were called then - were the 800m and 880y and Diane held the world record for 800m.

Add to these achievements the fact she also won the England National Cross Country Championships for four consecutive years from 1953 to 1956. We can think of many athletes who have a great range of distances but what other athlete can claim such truly world record level performances from 400m to cross country?

Leather took up running at the relatively late age of 19, after leaving school and being inspired to run by watching the 1952 Helsinki Olympic Games. In the autumn of 1952 she joined Birchfield Harriers, where she was coached by Dorette Nelson-Neal and immediately impressed as a versatile runner, winning the Midland Cross Country Championships and then the England National Cross Country junior and senior titles in her first winter with the club.

Diane Leather broke the mile record five times, taking it from 5:08.0 to 4:45.0, as documented here in October 1955 ©The Illustrated London NewsDiane Leather broke the mile record five times, taking it from 5:08.0 to 4:45.0, as documented here in October 1955 ©The Illustrated London News



Then, over a two-year time period from 1953 to 1955, Diane improved the women's world best for the mile on five occasions and by a total of 23 seconds, taking it from 5:08.00 to 4:45.00, a time that remained unbroken for seven years.

She finally gained her opportunity to run at the Olympic Games in Rome in 1960, as Mrs Diane Charles, but was eliminated in the first round of the 800m, finishing fifth in her heat in 2:14.24. Her glory years had gone, and had records been different, she would have had more "officially" than most all others in British athletics history. In a more enlightened era, her name would have been prominent among the world record holders and, probably, as an Olympic gold medallist.

A current author takes the view, "If a man had done such things, his name would be revered." But Diane Charles, herself, revokes this notion. In response to a BBC interviewer's question in 2004, "Have you ever felt that you should have had as much attention paid to you as he [Roger Bannister] has had?" she emphasised:

"At the time I did get a lot of attention from people in athletics who knew what it meant and from the press at the time. It was different. I don't know that you could compare it, except that it was a barrier, five minutes. Lots of men had been chasing the four-minute barrier. I don't think it was the same for the women and they also had pacemakers, or people who were equally as well with them."

Diane Leather (left) was inducted into England Athletics' Hall of Fame in 2013 ©England AthleticsDiane Leather (left) was inducted into England Athletics' Hall of Fame in 2013
©England Athletics



Yes, it was different for Diane Leather Charles. She set herself goals far beyond the reach and company of her peers and achieved them. Today, the women's world record for the mile stands at 4:12.56 set in 1996 by Russia's Svetlana Masterkova.

Who among the women today dares to challenge the four-minute barrier - it will come to pass, as Leather has already proven, barriers are there to be broken.

Peter John L. Thompson has been involved in the world of athletics for over half-a-century, as an athlete but, mostly, as a coach for almost 40 years to international level middle and long distance athletes. The athletes he has coached have competed in the Olympic Games, Commonwealth Games and World Championships. This article was first published by RunBlogRun and is reproduced with permission.

Mike Rowbottom: Liz Lynch’s golden moment - and Glasgow’s first gold of the 2014 Games

Mike Rowbottom
Mike Rowbottom ©insidethegamesAs I recall, and it was a long time ago, Liz McColgan seemed very pleased indeed to have won the 10,000m gold at the 1990 Auckland Commonwealth Games.

I distinctly remember, in the wake of her emphatic victory, and at the end of an extended chat with members of the media at the Mount Smart Stadium, the pride of Dundee and Scotland spoke in gleeful tones about a rendezvous with a whisky bottle. You got the feeling, late as it was, that her night was still young. I suppose she could have been joking. But I don't think so.

Pleased as she appeared then, however, it turns out she was not as pleased as she had been four years earlier when - under her maiden name of Liz Lynch - she became the host country's only track gold medallist at the Edinburgh Commonwealth Games in defeating New Zealand's Commonwealth 10,000m record holder Anne Audain with a perfectly judged surge over the final two laps.

The Scot - who now prefers to be known as Liz Lynch Nuttall following her marriage to former British international runner John Nuttall in January - took more than a minute off her personal best to set a time of 31 min 41.42sec - a Commonwealth, UK and Scottish all-comers' record. But as she revealed afterwards, what made her cry on the podium was not the extent of her achievement so much as the "overwhelming, totally unbelievable" sound of a fervent home crowd and the rendition of "Scotland the Brave."

Liz Lynch Nuttall - Liz Lynch as was - en route to what she has since described as the "best moment" of her sporting life - victory in the 10,000m at the 1986 Edinburgh Commonwealth Games ©Getty ImagesLiz Lynch Nuttall - Liz Lynch as was - en route to what she has since described as the "best moment" of her sporting life - victory in the 10,000m at the 1986 Edinburgh Commonwealth Games ©Getty Images





That she ranks her 1986 win above all else in a career that was to encompass a world title, an Olympic silver medal and victory in the London Marathon - she later described it as "the best moment" of her sporting life - is a huge tribute to the power of home. And also to the enduring power of the Commonwealth Games.

The value of the former world champion's memorable victory on home soil was affirmed this week as the eldest of her five children, Eilish, was invited to become the first athlete to test the newly laid track at Hampden Park which will host athletics at the Glasgow 2014 Games which open on July 23.

"My mum has told me all about the unbelievable atmosphere and overwhelming support of the crowd when she competed and won gold in front of a home crowd at the 1986 Commonwealth Games in Edinburgh and I know that's a standout memory of all her races throughout the years," said the 23-year-old, who was accompanied on the plush new track by pupils from the nearby Mount Florida Primary School.

Eilish McColgan, and pupils from Mount Florida Primary School, get a first feel of the new track at Hampden Park this week ahead of the IAAF Diamond League meeting and Glasgow 2014 Games ©Getty ImagesEilish McColgan, and pupils from Mount Florida Primary School, get a first feel of the new track at Hampden Park this week ahead of the IAAF Diamond League meeting and Glasgow 2014 Games ©AFP/Getty Images

"I'm just so excited at the prospect of competing in a home Games and she's [her mother] told me the support I'll have from the Scottish crowd as a Scottish athlete will be on another level."

That will be literally true, given the fact that, in order to accommodate the track, the pitch at Hampden has been raised by almost two metres using a temporary deck which is made up of 1,200 base panels supported by more than 6,000 structural steel stilts.

The two-day IAAF Diamond League meeting which usually takes place in London will act as an effective test event for the Games when it takes place from July 11 to 12.

When one recalls the dismal sequence of indecision and political confusion which accompanied the plans to convert the old Wembley Stadium into something able to accommodate the IAAF World Championships in 2003 - oh no, sorry, make that 2005 - oh no sorry, make that not at all - then Glasgow's achievement appears outstanding.

Games organisers claim the track - which will be dismantled a few months after the summer activity is over - and the warm-up track installed nearby at Lesser Hampden, have been provided within the target budget of £14 million ($23 million/€17 million).

No wonder the Glasgow 2014 chief executive David Grevemberg told my insidethegames colleague Gary Anderson this week that the process - fashioned in partnership with Scottish firm Malcolm Construction - had amounted to a "fantastic journey".

David Grevemberg, chief executive of the Glasgow 2014 Games, said this week that the Hampden Park stadium conversion had been a "fantastic journey" ©Getty ImagesDavid Grevemberg, chief executive of the Glasgow 2014 Games, said this week that the Hampden Park stadium conversion had been a "fantastic journey" ©Getty Images

The woman who turned this audacious technological challenge into a reality is Suzanne McCormack, an architectural technologist who was part of the team which created the Velodrome for the London 2012 Olympics.

She applied new techniques to create what was the world's first proper running track built on stilts. The first eight rows of seats at Scotland's national stadium disappeared beneath the enormous steel structure.

"This has never been done before," McCormack told the Daily Record last year. "Steel stilts have been used for temporary 110m straight tracks in Newcastle and Manchester, as well as the ice rink in George Square and the equestrian course at the London Olympics - but it's completely new for a 400m track."

The newly installed, temporary, athletics track at Hampden Park - suspended six feet above the pitch on stilts ©AFP/Getty ImagesThe newly installed, temporary, athletics track at Hampden Park - suspended six feet above the pitch on stilts ©AFP/Getty Images

Officials built a mock-up section on a vacant plot at Clyde Gateway East, near the Chris Hoy Velodrome, which was tested by a machine provided by the International Association of Athletics Federations - and Scottish high hurdler Chris Baillie.

At the time Grevemberg accepted that the plan was challenging but, if successful, could save a fortune on dedicated athletics stadiums at future Games.

"We don't need a new athletics stadium in Glasgow," McCormack added. "We have three stadiums which have a capacity of 50,000 or more - Hampden, Celtic Park and Ibrox. We don't need a white elephant of an athletics stadium that's going to sit there empty."

All in all, it surely ranks as the first gold medal performance of the Games.

Mike Rowbottom, one of Britain's most talented sportswriters, covered the London 2012 Olympics and Paralympics as chief feature writer for insidethegames, having covered the previous five summer Games, and four winter Games, for The Independent. He has worked for the Daily Mail, The Times, The Observer, The Sunday Correspondent and The Guardian. His latest book Foul Play – the Dark Arts of Cheating in Sport (Bloomsbury £12.99) is available at the insidethegames.biz shop. To follow him on Twitter click here.

David Owen: FIFA reform - a modest proposal

David OwenThe material published in the latest Sunday Times expose has sparked renewed calls for Joseph Blatter, FIFA's 78-year-old President, to stand down.

This is not remotely surprising. And, indeed, I concur there are strong arguments for his current term being his last - even though, in the real world, he still looks well-placed to sail triumphantly to a fifth term at the head of world football's governing body from 2015.

I also think, though, that the question of Blatter's personal future tends to distract attention from the more important issue.

The nature of his leadership is a symptom not a cause of FIFA's deficiencies.

The Swiss septuagenarian has exploited with great skill a failed governance system.

Reforming this system is the key task. Still.

Whenever I think about this, I keep coming back to the enviable position of the Confederations in world football's jigsaw of power.

A Confederation President in control of his continent's bloc vote can, if he so chooses, exert considerable 'ballot-box' pressure both upwards, to influence the decisions of FIFA's Executive Committee, and downwards, to sway votes taken in Congress.

This can leave the FIFA President, who has no Confederation to run and therefore no confederation colleagues to support him, startlingly impotent, unless he succeeds in bringing some of the big Confederation bosses around to his point of view.

FIFA President Sepp Blatter can be left startlingly impotent when it comes to influencing votes ©Getty ImagesFIFA President Sepp Blatter can be left startlingly impotent when it comes to influencing votes ©Getty Images



A resourceful master politician such as Blatter has plenty of levers at his disposal in order to achieve this.

But in terms of raw voting power inside the Executive Committee alone, he is no better off than the President of the microscopic Oceania Football Confederation (OFC).

This can apply even to a FIFA President who has proved as masterful at preserving his own position as Blatter.

As evidence, you need look only at the first round of voting in the election to choose a host for the 2022 World Cup, when I believe Blatter was alone in casting his ballot for Australia.

I am not aware of him ever having confirmed this, but I don't believe that he voted for Qatar at any point in the four-round contest.

So, for effective governance, you either need a system that produces wise confederation heads, or a mechanism for blocking the most questionable decisions, preferably both.

With a nod to the US democratic system, I believe this could be achieved by creating a FIFA Senate of independent international VIPs


This body would have two key roles: to vet Confederation heads on appointment and re-election to assess, first, their credentials and, subsequently, their track record; to review and, where judged necessary, to block big decisions taken by the Executive Board and FIFA Congress.

This blocking power should be used extremely sparingly.

Then again, I think its very existence would exert a positive influence on the quality of decision-making by football officials.

A FIFA Senate would help keep the Executive Board and Congress in check ©Getty ImagesA FIFA Senate would help keep the Executive Board and Congress in check ©Getty Images



How though would we decide who should sit on this Senate? - a matter plainly of the utmost importance, since, if you chose the wrong people, the whole exercise would be a waste of time and money.

I would suggest seeking the assistance of another sports body which has succeeded in transforming its governance reputation considerably for the better in recent times: the International Olympic Committee (IOC).

Very simply, the IOC could invite Governments and other bodies to submit Senator nominees.

The IOC's Executive Board would then select a balanced group of, I would think, no more than 20 individuals, with a wide range of specialisms - business, law, the environment, perhaps even a writer or two - to comprise the Senate.

Their term of office should be relatively long; six years seems about right.

But no-one should serve more than one term. Neither the FIFA President nor any Confederation head should play any role in their selection.

Many no doubt will rule out any such initiative on principle, saying it would dilute football's ability to direct its own affairs.

By seeking to involve independent outside voices in key decisions, however, football would, in a sense, be doing no more than attempting to strike the sort of balance maintained by the IOC, whose 100-plus members include eminent people from various fields besides sport.

The IOC has this flexibility because it is, in essence, a club not a federation.

The International Olympic Committee has transformed its governance reputation, so why couldn't such a model work for FIFA? ©AFP/Getty ImagesThe International Olympic Committee has transformed its governance reputation, so why couldn't such a model work for FIFA? ©AFP/Getty Images



Almost no-one, moreover, would claim that its administrative record was flawless.

In recent years, though, it has steered what most sports-watchers would accept was a generally sensible and successful path.

FIFA, in spite of presiding over the second-most popular recreational pursuit known to man, has become, to put it politely, a laughing-stock.

If a method can be devised of importing some of the IOC's new-found surefootedness, it should grasp the opportunity with alacrity.

And those with leverage to encourage it to act fast should do so.

David Owen worked for 20 years for the Financial Times in the United States, Canada, France and the UK. He ended his FT career as sports editor after the 2006 World Cup and is now freelancing, including covering the 2008 Beijing Olympics, the 2010 World Cup and London 2012. Owen's Twitter feed can be accessed here.

Alan Hubbard: Frank Keating - a sports journalist who was master of the written word

Alan HubbardIf peerless commentator David Coleman, to whom the BBC rightly paid a fine tribute recently, was the master of the spoken word then surely Frank Keating was his equal with the written one.

Both giants of their respective trades, they passed away within a month of each other at the turn of the year, Coleman at 87 and Keating at 75.

Coleman had a fitting star-studded memorial on screen while Keating's now comes with a newly-published collection of his Guardian essays (The Highlights, Frank Keating), edited by his former colleague Matthew Engel, Faber and Faber, £19.99 ($33.48/€24.57)

I shared many joyous assignments with Keating, who was somewhat less economical with his bon mots than "one-nil" Coleman.

His language could be flowery, but the prose, which delighted and enthralled readers over four decades, was always compelling.

Frank Keating, much like David Coleman (pictured), was a master of his trade ©Bob Thomas/Getty ImagesFrank Keating, much like David Coleman (pictured), was a master of his trade ©Bob Thomas/Getty Images




Several modern sportswriters, not least the marvellous Hugh McIlvanney, with whom I worked on The Observer, have aspired to and reached great literary heights, but few have had such an eloquent talent to amuse and entertain as did the Hereford-born Keating with phraseology that was always fresh and inventive.

As one former colleague puts it: "He didn't write so much about sport's language or technique, he wrote about its soul."

As the book shows, barely a sport was left untouched by his lyricism, and he had a special passion for the Olympics, covering several Games with joyous appreciation of their ideals coupled with a rare wit. But he could be acerbic with his criticism too.

It is an easy pleasure to pluck gems from this collection of Olympic observations. This is how he began a perceptive piece on the Ben Johnson affair in Seoul 1988:

"I don't know how many Olympic competitors say their prayers night and morning as a matter of course. But I bet a heck of a lot more than usual woke up to Seoul's chilly grey dawn yesterday and, with a shiver, offered thanks: 'There but for the grace of God go I.' Ben Johnson is taking the rap for a pretty large army."

Of the heavy-handednesss of those uniformed jobsworths in charge of  so-called security at the awful Atlanta Olympics he opined:

"To us in the vast congregation of hangers-on who piled out of the caravans three weeks ago, the true heroine of the 1996 Games was not a tweetie-pie gymnast, a runner, a jumper, a standing-still long-legged length of pulchritude frozen in concentration as she prepared to defy gravity in the women's long jump...to us lot in the invading army which marched across Georgia cursing, the heroine was Mrs Dick Pound, wife of Canada's IOC bigwig, who kneed an Atlanta policewoman in  the groin. It goes without saying that the cop was over-officious and over-harassed and over-the-top. Every one of them has been, male or female...they hated us and it was mutual."

And he had this to say of Atlanta's Opening Ceremony. "It was a stroke of genius to ambush the world with the surprise appearance of Muhammad Ali to light the flame of goodness and expectation .Up travelled the sacred lick of the flame by pulley to ignite the Olympic bowl in the  topmost  plinth. Hurrah-until we saw that the bowl was cast in the open-shell shape of a gigantic chip-wrapper for McDonald's French fries. The hamburger conglomerate has been cashing in." Every heroic image, said Keating, was capped by something seedy.

Anyone for fries? The cauldron for the Atlanta 1996 Olympics, pictured being lifted into place two months before the Games, somewhat irked Frank Keating ©AFP/Getty ImagesAnyone for fries? The cauldron for the Atlanta 1996 Olympics, pictured being lifted into place two months before the Games, somewhat irked Frank Keating ©AFP/Getty Images



But by and large he loved the Olympics, finding them beguiling and uplifting

He also had literary love affairs with cricket, rugby and boxing.

My favourite boxing intro of all time remains his preview of the Ali-Dunn world heavyweight title fight in 1976, which began: "Tonight, in Munich's Olympiahalle, Muhammad Ali, of the Universe, meets Richard Dunn of No 2 Northcote Terrace, Bradford."

Who else but Keating could have described the moment when John Conteh had his teeth knocked as: "A faint tinkle of crystal like a chandelier caught in a Waterford breeze."

Keating liked not so much the brutality, but the bonhomie of boxing, particularly among fellow scribes. We used to josh him when he walked into the media room at big fights in Las Vegas, seeking a dinner companion or two for that evening. "Much love, m'dears," he would wave cheerily as he left.

His use of that phrase usually left macho American writers spluttering into their coffee. "Is he some sort of fag?" they'd query, eyebrows raised. Well, family man Frank may have been fey, but he certainly wasn't gay.

He did rather enjoy a bottle or two of decent vino when he was composing his pieces, which he would self-deprecatingly dismiss as "my  drivel." A waiter, with bottle and glass balanced on a tray, tapping on his hotel room door, was a familiar sight.

But much as he loved most sports, there were some he couldn't abide. One was ice dancing. To him Torvill and Dean were "Borevill and Preen."

And he positively loathed tennis. Or rather, its ancestral home, Wimbledon.

Wimbledon was most definitely not one of Frank Keating's favourite haunts ©Popperfoto/Getty ImagesWimbledon was most definitely not one of Frank Keating's favourite haunts ©Popperfoto/Getty Images



To Keating, politically a lifelong leftie, 'Wimmers' represented what was wrong with British society. He found it stuffy, smug and snooty - a veritable Tory garden party. And he frequently said so.

On one occasion, years ago, he temporarily loaned his Centre Court press pass to a young fan who had been trying, unsuccessfully, to get in all day. A cardinal sin. Keating was rumbled by officials and hauled before an All-England Club committee.

They told him that as a result he would be banned from Wimbledon for the next three days. "Can't you make it life?" he pleaded.

David Coleman, the first broadcaster to receive the Olympic Order in recognition of his contribution to the Olympic movement, would never have committed such an aberration.

Here was the consummate pro, a wordsmith as equally but differently gifted as Keating but with phrases judiciously selected and imparted over 46 years of broadcasting.

Keating had also been versed in TV but as a producer and editor rather than a presenter, while unlike today's celebrity sportscasters, Coleman had been weaned on real journalism, editing his local newspaper. So they were both very much two of a kind professionally.

Yet while Keating was affable and easy-going, Coleman was difficult and demanding. Someone once said his bark was worse than his bite. "Don't you believe it," his former colleague John Motson remarks cryptically.

However no sports commentator - before or since - has had such a commanding all-round presence at the microphone. He knew sport inside out and had the respect of those who played it - as underscored by the great and the good who packed the memorial event organised by the BBC.

Many a Coleman commentary was vividly recalled, not least his masterful conveyance of the Black September raid on the Olympic Village at Munich in 1972, a day-long marathon from dawn until the dreadful conclusion late that evening.

David Coleman's reporting of the unfolding hostage crisis at Munich 1972 was masterful ©Sports Illustrated via Getty ImagesDavid Coleman's reporting of the unfolding hostage crisis at Munich 1972 was masterful ©Sports Illustrated via Getty Images



There were the multitudinous "Colemanballs" famously columnised in the satirical magazine Private Eye, which Coleman himself much enjoyed. Especially those that were not even uttered by him.

His widely-attributed classic that the Cuban 800 metres double Olympic gold medallist, Alberto Juantorena, "opened his legs and showed his class", actually spilled from the lips of  the late athletics pundit Ron Pickering.

Equally though, it might have been penned, rather more tongue in cheek, by dear old Frank Keating. With much love, m'dears, of course.

Alan Hubbard is an award-winning sports columnist for The Independent on Sunday and a former sports editor of The Observer. He has covered a total of 16 Summer and Winter Games, 10 Commonwealth Games, several football World Cups and world title fights from Atlanta to Zaire.