The Norwegian capital pulled out of the race earlier this month after the country's coalition Government failed to back the bid in the face of formidable public opposition, leaving Almaty and Beijing as the only remaining candidates.

Afterwards, the IOC fiercely criticised Oslo 2022 for missing an opportunity and failing to properly brief politicians, while, at the same time, the IOC have been lambasted for a list of supposedly "over-extravagant" guidelines given to all the candidates.

The meeting, which has no confirmed date yet but is likely to take place at the end of October or the beginning of November, will feature a "small group" of representatives from the Norwegian Olympic and Paralympic Committee and Confederation of Sports (NOC), including some who were directly involved with Oslo's bid.

"It is about building the bridges between the IOC and Norway before Lillehammer 2016 (Winter Youth Olympic Games), the next Olympic event," NOC secretary general Inge Anderson told insidethegames.

"From our side, we were disappointed [with the withdrawal] but we respect the decision of the Government.

"The Winter Olympic bid was a complex and difficult situation with the coalition Government we had, which was highly political but also very emotional in Norway.

"But we have always had good cooperation and dialogue with the IOC, and we are keen to show our support for Agenda 2020, which is very interesting and important."

IOC President Thomas Bach meeting with Norwegian Culture Minister Thorhild Widvey during a visit to Norway in May ©Getty Images

But, with three other European contenders - Stockholm, Kraków and Lviv - having withdrawn from the 2022 race, and two others - Munich and Davos/St Moritz - having abandoned potential attempts following failed referendums before the process even began, revitalising interest in the bidding process is key.

This is a crucial part of the Olympic Agenda 2020 reform process, due to culminate in the Extraordinary IOC Session in Monte Carlo on December 8 and 9.

Anderson highlighted better communication, both in terms of the cost of the Games, as well as how much the IOC contributes to the process, as a particularly important aspect.

He also said that, in an age of social media and easily accessible information, everyone has to be aware of how information can be interpreted and, consequently, the IOC must work to clarify that their manuals are "suggestions" rather than concrete demands.

"There is a lesson to learn for us in Norway and for the IOC," he said, before reiterating that they are keen to have a "good dialogue" and to perfect preparations for Lillehammer 2016.

Contact the writer of this story at [email protected]


Related stories

October 2014: Alan Hubbard: Oslo's slap in the face for "out of touch" IOC

October 2014: "Pompous" IOC demands "led to withdrawal of Oslo 2022 Olympic bid"
October 2014: IOC launch stinging attack on Oslo 2022 after it pulls Olympic bid

September 2014: Oslo 2022 axe Olympic bid after majority Conservative Party fail to give support

May 2014: Oslo 2022 bid in balance after Norwegian Progress Party votes against it